| 
 
 
 
 
MASONRY IN NORMAN ENGLAND
CHAPTER IX
the arcane schools 
John Yarker
 
WE made mention in our last Chapter of a series of Masonic legends 
which are, in some measure, historically opposed to the old Saxon 
Constitutions.  These first appear in written documents of about 1450 A.D., but 
as these are copies of still older MSS., may well date into the 12th century in 
this country.  There are two old MSS. the laws of which differ in essential 
points: in the elder or "Cooke MS." those legends which imply a Semitic origin 
and actually represent our present Craft Rites, form the Preface, or Commentary, 
to an actual Saxon Charge; whilst the later, or "Wm. Watson MS," is a copy of a 
much older document, and itself over two centuries old, is complete in itself, 
with a modified series of charges: the second part might belong to a Guild 
which had a traditional preference to a Saxon Constitution, and the first to a 
later compiler, one who had accepted the Norman system, and its Rites.  We will 
endeavour in this Chapter to supply such reliable information, as can be 
gathered, to account for the legends superimposed upon the older. 
   It is in Norman times, adding French details, that this 
matter shews itself, and as there is yet no established view on the subject, it 
may be examined in various aspects.  In the first place these legends may have 
been fixed in France by the conquests which the Saracens made in that country; 
or 2ndly, they may have reached that country through the Moorish conquests in 
Spain; or 3rdly, and a probable view, they might have been brought {295} from 
the East, by those Masons who returned in the train of the Crusaders; lastly, 
but upon this we place small credence, some of our able critics have held that 
the Oriental legends are collected from books of general history by the first 
compiler of this version of the Charges, though admitting that the author had 
old Masonic Charges to guide him. 
   A very elaborate paper, which may be classed with the 
first of these views, has been written by Brother C. C. Howard, of Picton, New 
Zealand, and he relies upon the fact that this new Charge draws its inspiration 
from Roman Verulam and the erection of St. Albans by Offa, King of Mercia, circa 
793, and that one Namas Graecus, under various spellings, is given as the 
teacher of Masonry in France.  Offa is supposed, by Brother Howard, to have 
brought Masons from Nismes, or Nimes, in Southern France, for the purpose in 
view, hence the derivation of Namas Graecus. 
   A theory such as that of Brother Howard would well account 
for all that is peculiar in this Constitution.  The present Nimes is a very 
ancient Greco-Roman town, and has perfect remains of the work of their 
architects; moreover it was for two centuries in the hands of the Saracens, 
until Charles Martel, who was the traditional patron of French Masons and the 
Hammer of the Saracens, drove them out of that town, and may then have appointed 
a Duke or prince to rule it.  The "Cooke MS" like the Strasburg Statutes speak 
of Charles II., but this is an error, and it is noteworthy that the "Charges of 
David and Solomon," are invariably united with the French patronage, proving 
that we derive these Masonic views from French sources.  At whatever date these 
Constitutions first appeared in this country they eventually superseded the 
English version. 
   The Saracens were large builders in the East, and even the 
Mausoleum of Theodric of Ravenna, erected in the 6th century, is considered by 
de Vogue to be the work of Syrian Masons brought forward by Byzantines.  It is 
{296} said that about the year 693 they assembled 12,000 stonecutters to build 
the great Alamya at Damascus.<<Condes "Arabs in Spain.">>  The Tulun 
Mosque at Cairo which was built in the 9th century, has all the main features of 
Gothic styles, and the same race erected numerous magnificent works in Spain.  
Gibbon informs us that between 813-33 the Moors brought into Spain all the 
literature which they could obtain in Constantinople, and that between 912-61 
the most celebrated architects were invited from thence.  We learn from a 
catalogue of the Escuriel library that they possessed 70 public libraries, and 
that the MSS. handed down includes translations from Greek and Latin and Arabic 
writers on philosophy, philology, jurisprudence, theology, mysticism, talismans, 
divination, agriculture, and other arts.  They gave us astronomy, alchemy, 
arithmetic, algebra, Greek philosophy, paper-making, the pendulum, the mariners' 
compass, and our first notions of chivalry, and armed-fraternities.  Whether 
they gave us Gothic architecture may be doubtful but the durability of their own 
buildings is astounding, and Cordova, the seat of empire, covered a space 24 
miles by 6 miles, even in the 8th and 9th centuries, and was filled with 
magnificent palaces and public edifices.  Roger Bacon probably derived gunpowder 
through their intermediary. 
   It is possible that Syrian fraternities of Masons 
continued to exist until its invasion by the Saracens, and they themselves, as 
we have seen, had secret fraternities analogous to Freemasonry, and as the Koran 
accepts the history of the Jewish Patriarchs such a system as we now possess is 
in accord with their feelings, and might possibly be acceptable to a French 
fraternity who were Christians and had derived building instructions from a 
Moslem race.  If the Saracenic theory in regard to Nismes is inadmissable, or 
the derivation of the French Charges under Norman introduction, when the system 
had consolidated under the "Sons of Solomon;" there are two other views we may 
notice.  The possibility of a derivation from the {297} Spanish Moors; or 
through the Crusaders who returned from Palestine after erecting endless works 
with the assistance of the native Masons.  Neither of these two views will 
account fully for the fact that the Constitutions of the period of this 
Chapter connect the Charges of David and Solomon with the Namas Graecus "who had 
been at the building of Solomon's temple," with Charles Martel, or even Charles 
II.  But this is not a great difficulty, for Namas does not appear until circa 
1525, and was always a trouble to the Copyists, sometimes he is Namas, at others 
he is Aymon, or the man with a Greek name, and on one occasion he is Grenaeus.  
Again building, in Europe, was a clerical art down to the 12th century and 
laymen were subject to them; but the religion of the Saracens was of a different 
cast, and admitted from the very first, of the continuance of independent 
schools of Architecture attached to no Sheik-ul-Islam, Mollah, or Dervish.  On 
the whole we seem to be led by these considerations to the Norman-French 
introduction into this country of a species of Masonic rules, rites, and legends 
which existed in Southern France, and which were still further influenced in the 
13th century by Masons from the East; but the reader can judge of this upon 
reading all the facts. 
   When Abdur-Rahman built the great Mosque of Cordova in the 
short space of ten years, he said, -- "Let us raise to Allah a Jamma Musjid 
which shall surpass the temple raised by Sulieman himself at Jerusalem."  This 
is the oldest comparison which we have of Solomon's erection as compared with 
mediaeval erections, and coming from a Moslem is eminently suggestive.  Some 30 
years ago Bro. Viner Bedolphe brought forward some cogent arguments to prove 
that though our Craft Masonry had been derived from the Roman Colleges the 3rd 
Degree of Modern Masonry had been added, in its second half, by Moslems.  But as 
a matter of fact the existing Jewish Guilds have a ceremony from which our 
Modern 3rd Degree is derived through the ancient Guilds, and it is quite 
possible that the work {298} men of Abdur-Rahman found it of old date in Spain, 
as we shall see later; and that a Guild of them was employed at Cordova.  Mecca 
has had for ages a semi-Masonic Society which claims its derivation from the 
Koreish who were Guardians of the Kaaba; namely, the Benai Ibraham.  For some 
hundreds of years our Constitutions have asserted that Nimrod was a Grand Master 
and gave the Masons a Charge which we still follow.  Its first degree is the  
"Builders of Babylon," and is directed against Nimrod and his idols, and against 
idolatry in general.  Its second degree is the "Brothers of the Pyramids," and 
teaches, as do our own Constitutions, that Abraham taught the Egyptians 
geometry, and the mode of building the pyramids.  The third degree is "Builders 
of the Kaaba," in which the three Grand Master Masons Ibrahim, Ishmael, and 
Isaque, erect the first Kaaba, on the foundations of the temple erected by Seth 
on the plans of his father Adam.  At the completion of the Kaaba, the twelve 
chiefs or Assistants of the three Grand Masters are created Princes of 
Arabia.  The Society was clearly ancient in A.D. 600 as al Koran alludes to the 
legendary basis on which it is formed. 
   There is a very interesting French romance of the 12th 
century by Huon de Villeneuve which seems to have a bearing upon the names of 
our old Masonic MSS., or at least on a corrupt version of them; and which 
moreover commemorates the Masonic death of a person who is supposed to have 
battled with the Saracens in France and Palestine.  Either the work may veil 
legends of the Compagnonage, or, with less probability, these latter may have 
drawn something from it.  This romance is entitled Les Qualre Fils Aymon.  
Charlemagne returns victorious from a long and bloody war against the Saracens 
in Easter, 768, and has to listen to accusations against Prince Aymon of the 
Ardennes, for failing to perform his fealty in not warring against the 
Saracens.  Charlemagne has as colleagues Solomon of Bretagne, and his trusty 
friend the Duke of Naismes.  Renaud, Allard, Guichard, and {299} Richard, the 
"four sons of Aymon," depart from the Court in quest of adventure.  They defeat 
Bourgons the Saracen chief before Bordeaux, cause him to become a Christian, and 
after that restore Yon, King of Aquitaine, to his throne;  Renaud marries his 
daughter Laura and erects the Castle of Montauban.  Yon fears the anger of 
Charlemagne, persuades the four Aymons to solicit his grace, and they set out 
"with olive branches in their hands," but are treacherously waylaid by their 
enemies, and would have been slain but for the arrival of their cousin Maugis, 
and the "cyprus was changed for the palm."  Richard is taken prisoner, and 
condemned to death, but Maugis disguises himself as a Pilgrim, hangs the 
executioner, carries off Richard, and also the golden crown and sceptre of 
Charlemagne, who thereupon resolves to attack Montauban.  After a due amount of 
battles, peace is restored on condition that Renaud departs on a pilgrimage to 
Palestine.  On arrival there he is surprised to meet Maugis, and between them 
they restore the old Christian King of Jerusalem to the throne.  After an 
interval Renaud is recalled to France and on his arrival finds his wife dead of 
grief, as well as his aged father Aymon and his mother.  His old antagonists -- 
Naismes, Oger, and Roland have been slain at Ronciveux.  Five years later 
Charlemagne visits Aix-la-Chapel, with the three brothers Aymon and their two 
nephews, and the following is a literal translation of what occurred: "'Hollo! 
says the Emperor, to a good woman, what means this crowd?' The peasant answered, 
-- 'I come from the village of Crosne, where died two days ago a holy hermit who 
was tall and strong as a giant.  He proposed to assist the Masons to construct 
at Cologne the Church of St. Peter; he manoeuvred so well that the others who 
were jealous of his ability, killed him in the night time whilst he slept, and 
threw his body into the Rhine, but it floated, covered with light.  On the 
arrival of the bishop the body was exposed in the Nave, with uncovered face that 
it might be recognised.  Behold what it is that draws the {300} crowd.'"  The 
Emperor approached and beheld Renaud of Montauban, and the three Aymons, and two 
sons of Renaud, mingled their tears over the corpse.  Then the bishop said: -- 
Console yourselves!  He for whom you grieve has conquered the immortal palm."  
The Emperor ordered "a magnificent funeral and a rich tomb."  In the translation 
of Caxton it is the bishop who does this and also Canonises him as "St. Renaude 
the Marter."  In the time of Charlemagne, and even much later, there existed a 
great number of pre-Christian and Gnostic rites, and the Emperor is credited 
with reforming, or establishing, in Saxony, the country of Aymon, whose memory 
was held in great veneration even down to the 19th century, a secret fraternity 
for the suppression of Paganism, which has most of the forms of Modern 
Freemasonry.  Hargrave Jennings holds that the fleur-de-lis may be traced 
through the bees of Charlemagne to the Scarab of Egypt, and is again found on 
the Tiaras of the gods of Egypt and Chaldea.  After the Culdee Alcuin had 
assisted in building the Church of St. Peter at York, he went over to France, 
and became a great favourite at Court, having the instruction of the Emperor 
himself whom he terms a builder "by the Art of the Most Wise Solomon," who made 
him an Abbot.  Apart from the significance of this romance in a Masonic sense, 
which appears to have drawn on existing Masonry, there are some peculiar 
correspondences.  The body of Osiris was thrown into the Nile, that of Renaud 
into the Rhine.  The address of the bishop to the mourners is almost identical 
with that of the old Hierophants to the mourners for the slain sun-god.  As 
before stated the "branch" varied in the Mysteries, as the erica, the ivy, the 
palm, the laurel, the golden-bough.  As in the case of the substituted victim 
for Richard the Moslems held that a substitute was made for Jesus.  The romance 
confuses the time of Charlemagne, if we accept it literally, with that of a 
Christian King of Jerusalem, as the Masonic MSS. confuse the date of Charles of 
France with an apocryphal Aymon who was at the building {301} of Solomon's 
temple.  Possibly the Masons confused the Temple of Solomon with that existing 
one which Cardinal Vitry and Maundeville inform us was "called the Temple of 
Solomon to distinguish the temple of the Chivalry from that of Christ;" they 
allude of course to the house of the Knights Templars.  These legends may well 
represent some ancient tradition, and we know not what MSS. have perished during 
the centuries.  A curiously veiled pagan Mythology may be traced in Paris; 
comparing St. Denis to Dionysos.  The death of St. Denis takes place on 
Montmartre, that of Dionysos on Mount Parnassus; the remains of Denis are 
collected by holy women who consign them with lamentations to a tomb over which 
the beautiful Abbey was erected; but he rises from his tomb like Dionysos, and 
replacing his severed head walks away.  Over the southern gate of the Abbey is 
also sculptured a sprig of the vine laden with grapes which was a Dionysian 
symbol, and at the feet of the Saint, in other parts, the panther is 
represented, whose skin was in use in the Rites of the Mysteries. 
   Other attempts to identify Namas Graecus may be given.  
Brother Robert H. Murdock, Major R.A., considers that this person is the Marcus 
Graecus from whose MS. Bacon admits in De Nullitate Magiae, 1216, that he 
derived the composition of gunpowder.  There is one old MS. in the early days of 
the Grand Lodge that has adopted this view.  Here again we run against the 
Saracens, for Duten shews that the Brahmins were acquainted with powder from 
whom it passed to the Lulli or Gypsies of Babylon, the Greeks and Saracens, and 
it is thought to have been used by the Arabs at the siege of Mecca in 690; again 
Peter Mexia shews that in 1343 the Moors used explosive shells against Alphonso 
XII. of Castile, and a little later the Gypsies were expert in making the heavy 
guns.  Very little is known of Marcus Graecus but early in the 9th century his 
writings are, erroneously, supposed to be mentioned by the Arabian physician 
Mesue.<<The "Cyclo. of" Eph. Chambers, art. "Gunpowder.">> {302} 
The acceptance of Marcus of gunpowder notoriety as identical with Namas or 
Marcus of Masonic notoriety, necessitates one of two suppositions: (1) either he 
was the instructor, or believed to be so, of Charles Martel in Military 
erections; or (2) the fraternity of Masons had a branch devoted to the study of 
Alchemy and the hidden things of nature and science: much might he said in its 
favor, but unless there was some MS. of a much earlier date that mentions Namas 
or Marcus, and is missing, the introduction is probably only of the 16th century 
when Masons were actually Students of Masonry and the secret sciences.  Another 
theory has been propounded by Brother Klein, F.R.S., the eminent P.M. of the 
Quatuor Coronati Lodge, namely that Haroun al Raschid's son the Caliph al Mamun 
is "the man with a Greek name."  He shews that in the time of this Caliph the 
books of Euclid were translated into Arabic for the Colleges of Cordova, and it 
was not until the 12th century that Abelard of Bath rendered them into Latin.  
The original Greek MS. was lost for 700 years when it was found by Simon 
Grynaeus, a Suabian and co-labourer of Melancthon and Luther.  In 1530 he gave 
the MS. to the world, and we actually find that in some of our MSS. Graecus is 
transformed into Green, Grenenois, Grenus, Graneus.  Caxton printed the "Four 
Sons of Aymon" in the 15th century, and we find some scribes transforming Namas 
into Aymon.  Here we have a later attempt to identify the personality mentioned; 
he was a man of whom nobody knew anything, and each scribe sought to develop his 
own idea, if he had any. 
   Charlemagne was a contemporary of the Haroun al Raschid 
here mentioned who sent him a sapphire ornament and chain by his ambassador. 
   Green in his Short History of the English People 
(London, 1876) says: -- "A Jewish medical school seems to have existed at 
Oxford; Abelard of Bath brought back a knowledge of Mathematics from Cordova; 
Roger Bacon himself studied under the English Rabbis" (page {303} 83).  Bacon 
himself writes: "I have caused youths to be instructed in languages, geometry, 
arithmetic, the construction of tables and instruments, and many needful things 
besides."  The great work of this mendicant Friar of the Order of St. Francis, 
the Opus Majus, is a reform of the methods of philosophy: "But from 
grammar he passes to mathematics, from mathematics to experimental philosophy.  
Under the name of Mathematics was enclosed all the physical science of the 
time." 
   It is beyond doubt that after the Norman conquest in 1066 
the predominant genius of Masonry was French; the oversight and the design were 
French, the labour Anglo-Saxon; but the latter were strong enough as shewn, by 
an eminent architect, to transmit their own style in combination with that of 
the French.  It must also be borne in mind that if the English towns have some 
claims to Roman succession, that feature is doubly strong in France, even to the 
language.  Long after the conquest of the country by the Franks, and even until 
modern times, the people were allowed to continue Roman laws, privileges, 
colleges, and Guilds; pure Roman architecture exists to this day, and notably at 
Nimes.  Lodges, though not perhaps under that name, must have existed from the 
earliest times, for we find that in the 12th century, the Craft was divided into 
three divisions; we may even say four, for besides the Passed Masters 
Associations, there were Apprentices, Companions or Journeymen, and perpetual 
Companions, or a class who were neither allowed to take an Apprentice, or to 
begin business as Masters; that is they could employ themselves only on inferior 
work.  The eminent historian of Masonry, Brother R. F. Gould, shews this, and 
also that the so-called "Fraternities" of France were the Masters' Associations, 
but that the Companions and Apprentices had to contribute to the funds that were 
necessary for their maintenance.  The qualification necessary to obtain 
Membership of this Association was the execution of a Master-piece, which was 
made as expensive as possible, {304} in order to keep down the number of 
Masters.  It will be seen at once that this is a very different organisation to 
the Constitution of the Assemblies of our last Chapter, and the reader must keep 
this distinction in mind, as well as the fact that there came over to this 
country a class of men impressed with these discordant views. 
   It would extend far beyond the scope of this book to give 
more than a very slight account of the numerous Abbeys, Monasteries, Churches 
and Castles which were erected after the Norman conquest; it is, however, 
necessary, in our inquiry after the Speculative element, to say something of 
these, and of the persons who erected them.  Doctor James Anderson states that 
King William the Bastard employed Gundulf, bishop of Rochester, and Earl Roger 
de Montgomery in building, or extending, the Tower of London, Castles of Dover, 
Exeter, Winchester, Warwick, Hereford, Stafford, York, Durham, Newcastle, also 
Battle Abbey, St. Saviour's in Southwark, and ninety other pious houses; whilst 
others built forty two such, and five cathedrals.  Battle Abbey was in building 
1067-90, the architect being a Norman Monk who was a noted arrow-head maker and 
therefore named William the Faber, or Smith.  Between 1070-1130 Canterbury 
Cathedral was in course of erection.  In 1076 Archbishop Thomas began the 
re-erection of the Cathedral of York, which had previously been burnt in contest 
with the Normans.  Between 1079-93, Winchester Cathedral was in progress.  The 
White or Square tower on the Thames is of this period and Jennings mentions one 
of the main pillars which has a valute on one side, and a horn on the other, 
which he considers to have the same significance as the two pillars of Solomon's 
temple, that is symbolising male and female.  It is evident that Masons must 
have now been in great demand and that whether Saxon or Norman were sure of 
employment; the following are of interest, and as we meet with any particulars, 
which have a distinct bearing upon the Masonic organisation, we will give them. 
{305} 
   The New Castle, whence the name of that town is taken, was 
built by a son of the Bastard, and thenceforth became, as in Roman times, a 
place of great strength, and also the chief home of the Monastic Orders, for 
Benedictines, Augustinians, Carmelites, Franciscans, Hospitallers of St. John, 
and Nuns all built houses here, and their conventual buildings within its walls, 
and many an Hospitium for wayfarers, many Guilds, and many a chapel of black, 
white and grey Friars were founded.  The Percys had a town residence here in the 
narrow street called the Close. 
   In 1074 Lincoln Cathedral was begun by Remgius Foschamp, 
the Norman Bishop, who had it ready for consecration in 8 years.  It was 
destroyed by fire in 1141, but Bishop Alexander restored it to more than its 
former beauty.  Where the Castle now stands existed an ancient fortress which 
the Bastard converted into a Norman stronghold. 
   In 1077 Robert the Cementarius, or Mason, had a grant of 
lands in reward for his skill in restoring St. Albans; and we may find in this 
circumstance the origin of the St. Alban Charge combined with that of Charles 
Martel and David and Solomon; including the Norman fiction that St. Alban had 
for his Masonic instructor St. Amphabel out of France.  We say fiction because 
Britain at that day sent Masons to Gaul. 
   In Yorkshire a Godifried the Master-builder witnesses the 
Whitby Charter of Uchtred, the son of Gospatric.  These are Danish names and the 
Marks of Yorkshire Masons, in this and the following century, are strong in the 
use of letters of the Runic or Scandinavian alphabet. 
   Baldwin, Abbot of St. Edmund's began a church in 1066 
which was consecrated in 1095.  Hermannus the Monk, compares it in magnificence 
to Solomon's temple, which is the first Masonic reference we have to that 
structure, and in Norman times. 
   Paine Peverell, a bastard son of the King, built a small 
round church at Cambridge which was consecrated in {306} 1101, this form being a 
model of the Holy Sepulchre at Jerusalem.  He also began a castle in Derbyshire, 
on a peak inaccessible on three sides one of which overlooks the Peak Cavern, 
which Faber supposes was used in the Druidical Mysteries. 
   A round church was erected at this period in Northampton, 
probably by Simon de St. Luz.  An ancient sun-dial is built into its walls; the 
tooling of the building is Saxon chevron style, in contradistinction from the 
Norman diagonal axe work. 
   There is a curiously mystic monument at Brent Pelham to 
Piers Shonke, who died in 1086.  Weever calls it "a stone whereon is figured a 
man, and about him an eagle, a lion, and a bull, having all wings, and an angell 
as if they would represent the four evangelists; under the feet of the man is a 
cross fleuree."  We must not hastily confound these emblems with the present 
quartering in the Arms of Freemasons. 
   During the reign of Rufus the great palace of Westminster 
was built, and thirty pious houses.  In 1089 the King laid the foundation of St. 
Mary's Abbey at York.  In the same year the Bishop of Hereford laid the 
foundation of the Gothic cathedral at Gloucester, and it was consecrated in 
1100.  In 1093 William of Karilipho, Bishop of Durham, laid the foundation of 
his cathedral, in the presence of Malcolm King of Scots and Prior Turgot.  
Surtees says that it "was on a plan which he had brought with him from France."  
In the same year the church of the old Culdee settlement of Lindisfarne was 
erected, and Edward, a monk of Durham, acted as architect. 
   In 1093 Hugh Lupus, Earl of Chester, sent for Anselme, 
Abbot of Bec, "by his conseile to build the Abbey of St. Werberg at Chester."  
It contains an old pulpit of black oak which is full of heraldic carving which 
has been mistaken for Masonic emblems.<<Past Grand blaster Smith, U.S.A.>>  It 
was in this Monastery {307} that Ralph Higden compiled the Polychronicon, a 
history often referred to in the "Cooke MS." 
   The work of Durham Cathedral was continued by Bishop 
Ranulf de Flambard from 1104 and completed before the year 1129.  Under Bishop 
William de Carilofe the grant which Waltheof, Earl of Northumberland, had made 
to the See of Durham was confirmed, of the Priory of Teignmouth to the Church of 
Jarrow, which was built by Benedict Biscop in 689 and of Wearmouth 8 years 
later.  Also Robert de Mowbray brought monks from St. Albans to rebuild the 
Priory Church, which was completed in 1110.  Anything connected with these 
Northern provinces is Masonically important, for Northumberland and Durham had 
many Operative Lodges long prior to the G.L. of 1717, and any legitimacy which 
that body can have it owes to those Northern Lodges, which eventually joined its 
ranks. 
   Northumberland is studded with fortified piles or towers 
and fortified vicarages which must have given much employment to Masons.  Elsden 
possessed one of these and also two folc-mote hills, where in old time, justice 
was administered in the open air, as in the Vehm of Westphalia, dating back one 
thousand years. 
   Oswold the good Bishop of Salisbury built the Church of 
St. Nicholas at Newcastle about the year 1004.  In 1115 Henry I. made grants to 
the Canons regular of Carlisle.  Many parts of the Church of St. Andrew are 
earlier than St. Nicholas, but its erection is of later date. 
   The Church of St. Mary, Beverley, is supposed to have had 
upon its site, a Chapel of Ease dedicated to St. Martin by Archbishop Thurston, 
of York, between 1114-42; it is certain, however, that it was constituted a 
Vicarage of St. Mary in 1325.  The Nave was built about 1450, and consists of 
six bays and seven clerestory windows, but in 1530 the upper part of the central 
tower fell upon the Nave with much loss of life.  Its pillar was erected by the 
Guild of Minstrels, which like that of the Masons, claimed to date from Saxon 
times; it has upon the fluted {308} cornishes five figures of the Minstrels with 
their instruments, of which only two respectively with guitar and pipe are 
intact; and stands on the north side facing the pulpit.  The Misere 
stalls in the chancel are of the 15th century, with carved bas reliefs under the 
seats; one of these represents a fox shot through the body with a 
woodman's arrow, and a monkey approaching with a bottle of physic. 
   In regard to symbolism Brother George Oliver, D.D., 
mentions an old church at Chester, which he does not name, containing the double 
equilateral triangles; also the same in the window of Lichfield Cathedral.  Mr. 
Goodwin states that the triple triangles interlaced may be seen in the tower of 
a church in Sussex.  We are now approaching the period of the Crusades, and it 
may be noticed that Cluny and other great French Abbeys are usually considered 
the centres of action whence proceeded the builders that accompanied the armies 
of the cross to Palestine.  Here an enormous number of buildings were erected, 
between 1148-89, in which Europeans directed native workmen, and in which the 
former learned a lighter style of architecture which resulted in pointed Gothic; 
a style which had early existence in the East, for Professor T. Hayter Lewis 
points out that the 9th century Mosque at Tulun in Cairo has every arch pointed, 
every pier squared, and every capital enriched with leaf ornament; this style 
the returned Masons began to construct and superintend in the West. 
   Mr. Wyatt Papworth mentions that a Bishop of Utrecht in 
1199 obtained the "Arcanum Magisterium" in laying the foundation of a church, 
and that he was slain by a Master Mason whose son had betrayed the secret to the 
Bishop.  About this time was begun the old church at Brownsover, near Rugby; 
when it was restored in 1876 two skeletons were found under the north and south 
walls, in spaces cut out of the solid clay, and covered over with the oakblocks 
of two carpenters' benches.  A similar discovery was made in Holsworthy parish 
church in 1885; {309} in this case the skeleton had a mass of mortar over the 
mouth, and the stones were huddled about the corpse as if to hastily cover it 
over.  There is no doubt that in this and many other cases the victims were 
buried alive as a sacrifice.<<"Builders' Rites and Ceremonies," G. W 
Speth, 1894.>>  They are instances in proof of a widespread and ancient belief 
of a living sacrifice being necessary. 
   King Henry I., 1100-35, built the palaces of Woodstock and 
Oxford, and fourteen pious houses, whilst others built one hundred such, besides 
castles and mansions.  The Bishop of Durham confirmed and granted privileges to 
the Hali-werk-folc who would be Saxon artificers. 
   In 1113 Joffred, Abbot of Croyland, laid the foundation of 
that Abbey; about 22 stones were laid by Patrons, who gave money or lands.  
Arnold is described as "a lay brother, of the art of Masonry a most scientific 
Master."  About this time, or a little earlier, the seven Liberal Arts and 
Sciences are designated the Trivium and Quadrivium, and the 
Chronicler gives us the following illustration of the first division: -- "During 
this time Odo read lessons in Grammar to the younger sort, Terrick 
Logic to the elder students at noon; and William Rhetoric in the 
afternoon; whilst Gilbert preached every Sunday, in different churches, in 
French and Latin against the Jews, and on holiday evenings explained the 
Scriptures to the learned and clergy."  In Essex's Bibliotheca Topographia, 1783 
(vol. iv.) we find it stated that the builders of this portion cut rudely at the 
west end of the south aisle, a pair of compasses, a lewis, and two circular 
figures, which, he supposes, are intended for sun and moon; in 1427, however, 
there were repairs in progress, not of this part, but in the west and north 
aisles.  This Abbey possessed a library of 900 books, and save that Joffrid, or 
Gilbert, exhibited so much animosity against the Jews, is so consonant with the 
first part of the "Cooke MS." that we might have taken it as a proof that the 
Semitic Rites existed in 1113.  They probably did in France and parts of Spain.  
The bronze candelabrum of {310} Gloucester was made in 1115, and has the double 
triangles and much other Masonic symbolism; it is of Byzantine design and 
approximates to old Egyptian work and symbolism. 
   King Stephen, 1135-54, employed Gilbert de Clare to build 
four Abbeys, two Nunneries, and the Church of St. Stephen at Westminster, whilst 
others built about ninety pious houses.  Jesus College at Cambridge was founded 
in this reign, and a very remarkable church was erected at Adel near Leeds.  It 
is recorded of a soldier of King Stephen, named Owen or Tyndal, that he received 
a species of religious Initiation at the Culdee Monastery in Donegal, placed in 
a pastos of the cell; he then went on a pilgrimage to the Holy-land, and 
on his return, as has been recorded of Renaud of Montauban, assisted in building 
the Abbey of Bosmagovsich.  The Marks of Birkenhead Priory of this date have 
been collected and printed by Brother W. H. Rylands, also those of St. John's 
Church in Chester, the Cathedral, Chester, and the walls, some of which are 
Roman work.<<"Ars Quat. Cor.," 1894.>> 
   In 1147 Henry de Lacy laid the foundation of Kirkstall 
Abbey in Yorkshire; it is of pointed Gothic.  Roche Abbey was built between this 
date and 1186, and these two are believed to be by the same architect.  Rivaulx 
and Fountains Abbey were begun in 1199 and 1200.  At this time Adam, a Monk of 
Fountains Abbey, and previously of Whitby, was celebrated for his knowledge of 
Gothic architecture, and officiated at the building of the Abbeys of Meux, 
Woburn, and Kirkstede; it is not said whether he was lay or cleric.  York 
Cathedral was again destroyed by fire in 1137, and Archbishop Roger began to 
re-erect it in 1154. 
   In Normandy the Guilds were travelling about like those of 
England and were of importance in 1145, and had a Guild union when they went to 
Chartres.  At this time Huges, Archbishop of Rouen, wrote to Theodric of Amiens 
informing him that numerous organised companies {311} of Masons resorted thither 
under the headship of a Chief designated Prince, and that the same companies on 
their return are reported by Haimon, Abbe of St. Pierre sur Dive, to have 
restored a great number of churches in Rouen. 
   The Priory of St. Mary in Furness was commenced by 
Benedictines from Savigney.  In 1179 the Priory of Lannercost was founded by 
Robert de Vallibus, Baron of Gillesland.  Bishop Hugh de Pudsey rebuilt the 
Norman Castle of Durham, dating from 1092 to 1174.  Between 1153-94 this Prelate 
was the great Transitional Builder of the north, and he began the erection of a 
new church at Darlington in 1180 on the site of an old Saxon one.  The great 
Hall of the Castle of Durham was the work of Bishop Hadfield in the reign of 
Richard III. on an older Norman one. 
   Henry II. between 1154-89 built ten pious houses, whilst 
others built one hundred such.  It is the era of the advent of the "transitional 
Gothic."  In the first year of this King's reign, 1155, the "Poor Fellow 
Soldiers of Jesus Christ, and of the Temple of Solomon," began to build their 
Temple in Fleet Street, London, and continued at work till 1190.  It is a round 
church in pointed Gothic to which a rectangular one was added later.  By Papal 
Bull of 1162 these Knights were declared free of all tithes and imposts in 
respect of their movables and immovables, and their serving brethren had like 
favours, indulgences, and Apostolic blessings.  James of Vitry says that they 
had a very spacious house in Jerusalem, which was known as the Temple of Solomon 
to distinguish the Temple of the Chivalry from the Temple of the Lord.  In the 
Rule which Bernard, Abbot of Clairvaux, drew up for them, he speaks of the 
poverty of the Knights, and says of their house that it could not rival the 
"world renowned temple of Solomon"; in chapter xxx., he again speaks of the 
poverty of the house of God, and of the temple of Solomon."  As a fraternity he 
designates them "valiant Maccabees."  Sir John Maundeville visited the house, 
and {312} speaks of it in 1356 thus: "Near the temple [of Christ] on the south 
is the Temple of Solomon, which is very fair and well polished, and in that 
temple dwell the Knights of the Temple, called Templars, and that was the 
foundation of their order, so that Knights dwelt there, and Canons Regular in 
the temple of our Lord."  As Masonic symbolism is found in their Preceptories, 
this would be a channel from which to deduce both our Solomonic legends, and the 
alleged Papal bulls, which Sir William Dugdale asserted were granted to 
travelling Freemasons; but this view has never met with favour from Masonic 
historians, who aim chiefly at writing things agreeable to their patrons and 
rulers.  Brother Oliver states that the high altar has the double triangles, at 
any rate these appear on the modern embroidered cover; there is the anchor of 
the Virgin, also the Beauseant of black and white, which Vitry interprets that 
they are fair to their friends but black to their enemies, but Jennings says: 
"This grandly mystic banner is Gnostic, and refers to the mystic Egyptian 
apothegm that light proceeded from darkness."  He further mentions these symbols 
in the spandrels of the arches of the long church -- the Beauseant; paschal lamb 
on a red cross; the lamb with the red cross standard triple cloven; a prolonged 
cross issuing out of a crescent moon, having a star on each side.  The arches 
abound with stars, from which issue wavy or crooked flames; the winged horse, 
white, on a red field, is one of their badges.  He adds that there is a wealth 
of meaning in every curve of the tombs, which appear in the circular portion. 
   Ireland has many works erected during this period, and Mr. 
Street says of them: "I find in these buildings the most unmistakable traces of 
their having been erected by the same men, who were engaged at the same time, in 
England and Wales."  The same remark will apply to Scotland. 
   The ancient Preceptory of the Temple at Paris contained 
(says Atlanta xi. p. 337) "24 columns of silver {313} which supported the 
audience chamber of the Grand Master, and the Chapel hall paved in Mosaic and 
enriched by woodwork of cedar of Lebanon, contained sixty huge vauses of gold."  
The fortress was partially destroyed in 1779. 
   Batissier in his Elements of Archaeology (Paris, 1843), 
says that the name Magister de Lapidibus vivis was given in the middle 
ages to the Chief artist of a confraternity -- Master of living stones.  Or the 
person was simply termed Magister Lapidum, and he refers on both these 
points to some statutes of the Corporation of Sculptors quoted by Father de la 
Valle.  For the origin of the first of these terms consult the Apocryphal books 
of Hermas, but the term has more in it than appears on the surface, for in Guild 
ceremonial the candidate had to undergo the same treatment as the stone, wrought 
from the rough to the perfect.  Amateurs were received, for the 1260 Charte 
Octroyie is quoted by the Bishop of Bale thus: "The same conditions apply to 
those who do not belong the Metier, and who desire to enter the 
Fraternity." 
   A Priory of the Clunic order of Monks was founded in 1161 
at Dudley by Gervase Pagnel, and they had others at Lewes, Castleacre, and 
Bermondsey. 
   A fire having occurred at Canterbury, Gervasius, a 
Benedictine Monk, in 1174, consulted "French and English Artificers," who 
disagreed in regard to the repair of the structure.  The account which Gervaise 
gives is highly interesting and instructing.  The work was given to William of 
Sens, "a man active, ready, and skillfull both in 'wood and stone.'  "He 
delivered models for shaping the stones, to the sculptors"; he reconstructed the 
choir and made two rows, of five pillars on each side; but in the fifth year he 
was so injured by the fall of his scaffold that he had to appoint as deputy a 
young Monk "as Overseer of the Masons."  When he found it necessary to return to 
France the Masons were left to the oversight of William the Englishman, a man 
"small in body, but in workmanship of many kinds acute and {314} honest."  The 
Nave was completed in 1180, and Gervaise informs us that in the old structure 
everything was plain and wrought with an axe, but in the new exquisitely
sculptured with a chisel. 
   We gather two points of information from this account of 
1160; first we have the information that William of Sens issued Models to 
the workmen, which explains a law of the Masonic MSS. that no Master should give
mould or rule to one not a member of the Society; we see, in the second 
place, that the chisel was superseding the axe.  We will also mention here that 
there is Charter evidence of this century, that Christian the Mason, and Lambert 
the Marble Mason had lands from the Bishop of Durham for services rendered.  The 
fall of Jerusalem in 1187 brought back from the East many artisans to the West, 
whose influence is traceable in the early pointed style, or as it is termed the 
"Lancet," or "Early English." 
   A noteworthy movement, which extended to other countries 
had place in France at this period.  A shepherd of the name of Benezet conceived 
the idea of building a bridge over the Rhone at Avignon; the bishop supported 
his scheme and superintended its erection between 1171-88.  Upon Benezet's 
death, in 1184, Pope Clement III. canonised him, and sanctioned a new Fraternity 
of Freres Pontives -- bridge builders. 
   In 1189, Fitz Alwine, Mayor of London, held his first 
assize, from which we learn that the Master Carpenters and Masons of the City 
were to be sworn not to prejudice the ancient rights ordained of the estates of 
the City. 
   Between 1189-1204 Bishop Lacey was engaged in adding to 
Winchester Cathedral. 
   There are references worthy of note in Scotland at this 
time.  In 1190 Bishop Jocelyne obtained a Charter from William the Lion to 
establish a "Fraternity" to assist in raising funds wherewith to erect the 
Cathedral of Glasgow; it is supposed to imply the existence of a band of 
travelling Masons.  The same bishop undertook the erection of the Abbey of 
Kilwinning.  The Templar {315} Preceptory of Redd-Abbey Stead was erected at the 
same time, and an ancient Lodge of Masons existed here last century. 
   In the reign of John, 1200-16, about forty pious houses 
were erected. Hugh, Bishop of Lincoln, about 1200, wrought with his own hands at 
the choir and transept of the Cathedral, the designs being by Gaufrids de Noires, 
"constructor ecclesiae."  The Masons' Marks are numerous; and it is asserted by 
Brother Emra Holmes that, from the central tower, may be seen three large 
figures of a monk, a nun, and an angel, each displaying one of the signs of the 
three degrees of Masonry.  The Cathedral has also an ancient stained glass 
window, which has the double triangles in four out of six spaces, an engraving 
of which appears in the Historical Landmarks of Brother George Oliver.  
Brother Fort asserts that the Masons of the middle ages must have received their 
technical education from the Priories, and that a tendency continually reveals 
itself to use the abstruse problems of Geometry as the basis of philosophical 
speculations, thus blending the visible theorems with unseen operations of the 
spirit.  He considers that the building operations of the Masons were canvassed 
in the Lodge and worked out mathematically, the plan of the building serving as 
the basis of instruction.  These views mean in two words that Masonry in all 
times was Operative and Speculative, but the identical system prevails to-day in 
some still existing Stone Masons' Guilds. 
   In 1202 Godfrey de Lucy, Bishop of Winchester, formed a 
"Fraternity" for repairing his church during the five years ensuing.  There is 
nothing to disclose the nature of these Fraternities; it may mean no more than a 
committee for collecting the means, possibly the Masters' Fraternities of the 
French may have given the idea.  At this period Gilbert de Eversolde was 
labouring at St. Albans' Abbey, as the architect, and Hugh de Goldcliffe is 
called a deceitful workman.  In 1204 the Abbey of Beaulieu in Hants was founded 
by King John, and {316} Durandus, a Master employed on the Cathedral of Rouen, 
came over to it by request.  In 1209 London Bridge, which was begun by Peter de 
Colchurch, was completed.  There is a slab, of this period, in the transept of 
Marton Church, W.R. Yorkshire, which has upon it a Calvary cross, a cross-hilted 
sword, and a Mason's square and level, pointing to the union of arms, religion, 
and art. 
   In 1212 a. second Assize was held in London by Mayor Fitz 
Alwyne, when owing to a great fire it was thought necessary to fix the wages.  
At this time a horse or cow could be bought for four shillings.  Masons were 
granted 3d. per day with food, or 4 ½d. without; Labourers had 1 ½d. or 3d.; 
cutters of free-stone 2 ½d. or 4d.; the terms used are "Cementarii," and "Sculptores 
lapidam Liberorum."  John died in 1216, and Matthew of Paris, and others, write 
his epitaph: "Who mourns, or shall ever mourn, the death of King John "; "Hell, 
with all its pollutions, is polluted by the soul of John." (i. 288) 
   In the reign of Henry III., 1216-72, thirty-two pious 
houses were erected, and the Templars built their Domus Dei at Dover.  The 
beginning of this King's reign is the period when Laymen, emancipating 
themselves from the Monasteries, come to the front as builders, and leaders of 
working Masons.  It is also the commencement of a more highly finished style of 
pointed Gothic introduced by the Masons who returned from Palestine.  During 
this reign flourished the celebrated Friar Roger Bacon, who, as member of a 
sworn fraternity, gave himself to the investigation of the hidden things of 
nature and science. 
   In the reign of Henry III. the Monks of Teignmouth raised 
a masterpiece of architecture in their new conventual church, which they 
completed by 1220, and were engaged in constant contention with the claims to 
jurisdiction of the Bishops of Durham; and then followed disputes with the 
burgesses of Newcastle, owing to the Monks fostering the trade of North 
Shields.  The Prior's officers were in the habit of meeting those of the common 
{317} law on the hill of Gateshead, or beneath a spreading oak in 
Northumberland, when they came to hold assizes in Newcastle. 
   In 1220 the foundation of Salisbury Cathedral was laid by 
Bishop Poore; Robert was Master Mason, and Helias de Berham, one of the Canons, 
employed himself on the structure.  Its base is the Patriarchal cross, its 
erection occupied 38 years, and it is the only Gothic cathedral in England built 
in one style of architecture.  The five-pointed star is found in the tracery of 
the arcades, and heads of 32 windows, and the equilateral triangle is the basic 
design of the parapet.  In 1220 Peter, Bishop of Winchester, levelled the 
footstone of Solomon's porch in Westminster Abbey.  He is the same person as 
Peter de Rupibus, a native of Poictiers, who served with Coeur de Lion in 
Palestine, and was knighted by him, created Bishop of Winchester in 1204, Chief 
Justice in 1214, went on a Pilgrimage to Palestine and returned in 1231.  
Amongst his architectural labours is a Dominican convent in Winchester; the 
Abbey of Pitchfield; part of Netley Abbey; a pious house at Joppa; and the Domus 
Dei in Portsmouth.  He died in 1238, and his effigy, which is a recumbent figure 
in Winchester Cathedral, has the right hand on the left breast, and his left 
hand clasping a book.<<Ars Quat. Cor.>> 
   From 1233-57 the Close Rolls give numerous details 
of the King's Masons who were employed at Guildford, Woodstock, and 
Westminster.  In 1253 the King had consultations with Masons, "Franci et Angli."  
It is also the period of origin of the "Geometrical" style. 
   There is a document of 1258 which, though French, has an 
important bearing on English Masonic legends, referring amongst other things to 
Charles Martel, and which, though traditional, was accepted as sufficient to 
secure important freedoms.  In this year Stephen Boileau, Provost of the 
Corporation of Paris, compiled a code of "Regulations concerning the arts and 
trades of Paris, {318} based upon the Statements of the Masters of Guilds," and 
amongst these we find the following in regard to the Masons, which gives them a 
double title to the term "Free," for they were free-stone cutters and free of 
certain duties: xxi.  The Masons (Macons) and plasterers are obliged to 
do guard duty, and pay taxes, and render such other services as the other 
citizens of Paris owe to their King. xxii.  The Mortar-Makers are free of guard 
duty, as also every stone-cutter since the time of Charles Martel, as the 
ancients ("Prudolmes" or wise men) have heard, from father to son."  The 
question arises here whether Masons and setters, who, were not free of duty, 
though cutters and sculptors were, use the term Carolus Secundus in England as a 
claim for the Masons and Setters.  The Prudomes were the Wardens under the 
"Master who rules the Craft," and we are further told that this Master had taken 
his oath of service at the Palace, and afterwards before the Provost of Paris.  
It is also said that, after six years' service the Apprentice appeared before 
"the Master who keeps the Craft," in order to swear "by the Saints," to conform 
to Craft usage.  He thus became a Journeyman, or Companion, but could not become 
a Master, and undertake the entire erection of a building, until he had 
completed such a "Master-Piece" as was appointed him, and which entailed much 
outlay; but if this was Passed he became a member of the "Masters' Fraternity."  
The difference between the Saxon and the French custom appears to be this: that 
whilst in the former case the acceptance of a Master rested with the same 
Assembly as that to which the Journeyman belonged, in the latter case the 
Masters' Fraternity was now a separate body, with independent laws.  The custom 
of Montpelier, according to documents printed by Brother R. F. Gould, would seem 
to have developed somewhat differently.  Here, after an Apprentice had served 
three years, he was placed for another four years to serve as a Journeyman, 
under a Master.  At the end of this period he might present his Master-piece, 
and if it was approved he took the oath to {319} the Provosts and only such 
sworn Master was permitted to erect a building from the basement; but it was 
allowable for a Journeyman to undertake small repairs.  Thus as city customs 
varied confusion must at times have arisen in journeying abroad.  There is 
mention in 1287, when the Cathedral of Upsala in Sweden was begun, that Etienne 
de Bonneuill took with him from Paris "ten Master Masons and ten Apprentices"; 
possibly some of the Masters or some of the Apprentices, were what we call 
Fellows, but there is nothing to warrant any classification.  It is important to 
shew the secret nature and the import of the French organisation, and 
Fraternities, and we quote the following from Brother J. G. Findel's History 
of Freemasonry: -- "The Fraternities existing as early as the year 
1189 were prohibited by the Council of Rouen ("cap." 25); and the same was most 
clearly expressed at the Council of Avignon in the year 1326, where (cap. 
37) it is said that the members of the Fraternity met annually, bound themselves 
by oath mutually to love and assist each other, wore a costume, had certain well 
known and characteristic signs and countersigns, and chose a president (Majorem) 
whom they promised to obey."  Nothing very vile in this. 
   In 1242 Prior Melsonby made additions to Durham Cathedral, 
and others were made by Bishop Farnham before 1247, and by Prior Hoghton about 
1290.  At Newcastle the church of All Saints was founded before 1296, and that 
of St. John in the same century.  The church of St. Nicholas was rebuilt in the 
14th century, but the present tower only dates from the time of Henry VI.  
Clavel says that the seal of Erwin de Steinbach, Chief Master of Cologne, 1275, 
bears the square and compasses with the letter G. 
   Turning to the North of England we find that at York in 
1171, 1127, 1241, and 1291, the choir, south transept, and nave of the Minster 
were either completed or in course of erection, and the workmanship is 
infinitely superior to later portions of the building.  In 1270 the new church 
of {320} the Abbey of St. Mary in York was begun by the Abbot Simon de Warwick, 
who was seated in a chair with a trowel in his hand and the whole convent 
standing around him.  There is also a Deed of 1277 with the seal of Walter Dixi, 
Cementarius, de Bernewelle, which conveys lands to his son Lawrence; the legend 
is "S. Walter le Masun," surrounding a hammer between a half-moon and a 
five-pointed star.  In this same year, 1277, Pope Nicholas II. is credited with 
letters patent to the Masons confirming the freedoms and privileges, said to 
have been granted by Boniface IV. in 614; if such a Bull was issued, it has 
escaped discovery in recent times. 
   In these somewhat dry building details it will have been 
noticed that references are made to French designers, and to consultation with 
French and English Masons, and with this enormous amount of building there must 
necessarily have been a constant importation of French Masons, with the 
introduction of French customs. 
   On the symbolism of this period there are some interesting 
particulars in the Rationale of Bishop Durandus, who died in 1296.  The 
"tiles" signify the protectors of the church; the winding-staircase 
"imitated from Solomon's temple" the hidden knowledge; the stones are the 
faithful, those at the corners being most holy; the cement is charity; 
the squared stones holy and pure have unequal burdens to bear; the 
foundation is faith; the roof charity; the door obedience; the
pavement humility; the four side walls justice, fortitude, 
temperance, prudence; hence the Apocalypse saith "the city lieth four 
square."<<"Ars Quat. Cor.," x, p. 60.>>  The custom is Hindu, French, 
British. 
   In a paper recently read before one of the learned 
Societies Professor T. Hayter Lewis has shewn that the builders of the early 
"Pointed Gothic "of the 13th century were of a different school to those who 
preceded them in the 12th century; he shews that the Masons' marks, the style, 
and the methods of tooling the stones, differ from the older work, and whilst 
the older was wrought with diagonal tooling, the later was upright {321} with a 
claw adze.  He traces these changes in methods and marks through Palestine to 
Phoenicia.  This new style, he considers, was brought into this country by 
Masons who had learned it amongst the Saracens, and though Masons' marks were in 
use in this country long before they were now further developed on the Eastern 
system.<<Ibid, iii, also v, p. 296>>  There is as well tangible evidence 
of the presence of Oriental Masons in this country; two wooden effigies, said to 
be of the time of the Crusades, were formerly in the Manor house of Wooburn in 
Buckinghamshire, of which drawings were shewn to the Society of Antiquaries in 
1814, and have recently been engraved in Ars Quatuor Coronatorum.<<Ibid, 
viii. 1895.>>  These effigies are life size, one represents an old man with 
quadrant and staff, the other a young man with square and compasses, and "the 
attire, headdress, and even features, indicate Asiatic originals."  It has been 
thought that the Moorish Alhambra at Grenada indicates the presence of Persian 
Masons, and we find the translator of Tasso's Jerusalem Delivered in 
every case substitutes the word Macon for Mohammed, but this is only a 
provincial abbreviation for Maometto. 
   Though supported in a superior manner, the theory of 
Professor Hayter Lewis is not new to Freemasonry, as in the 17th century Sir Wm. 
Dugdale, Sir Chris. Wren, and others fix upon the reign of King Henry III. as 
the period when the Society of Freemasons was introduced into England by 
Travelling Masons, protected by Papal Bulls, and Wren is said to have added his 
belief that pointed Gothic was of Saracenic origin, and that the bands resided 
in Huts near the erection upon which they were working, and had a Warden over 
every ten men.  But Elias Ashmole held that whilst such a reorganisation 
actually took place, it was upon a Roman foundation.  Dugdale probably derived 
his views from some monastic document, or tradition, whilst Ashmole as a Mason, 
with better information followed the old MS. Constitutions, as we {322} have 
done in these chapters.  Brother Gould is of opinion that the alleged Bulls were 
given to the Benedictines and other monkish fraternities who were builders, and 
that they only apply to Masons as members, or lay brothers of the Monasteries; 
and, we may add, Templars. 
   It must be clear to all who have eyes to see, that with 
this importation into England of the foreign element a new series of legends 
were engrafted upon.the original simple account of the old English Masons.  Such 
are the Charges of Nimrod, of David and Solomon, and of Charles Martel, and 
though we have no MSS. of this period to confirm us, there is no doubt that they 
are of this period; equally we have no contemporary text of the Charges by which 
the newly imported Masons were ruled.  The information already given enables us 
to see that there was a difference both in legends and laws between the two 
elements and that it was a sectarian difference. 
   English MSS., of more modern date, refer to "Books of 
Charges," where those of Nimrod, of Solomon, of St. Alban, and of Athelstan are 
included, and if they actually existed, as we see no reason to doubt, they were 
of this century.  Moreover the references to Carolus Secundus, or to Charles 
Martel, must be of this period (though there can be no doubt that this refers to 
Carolus Magnus or Charlemagne) as small importations of French Masons in Saxon 
times would not have influenced the older legends, nor stood a chance of 
adoption by the English.  In regard to the laws by which the French Masons were 
governed, we are, however, informed in the more modem MSS. that they differed 
but little, or "were found all one" with the Roman, British, and Saxon Charges.  
It is very evident that the early foreign element had a Charge of their own 
referring to Nimrod, David, Solomon, and Charles of France, applicable to their 
own ceremonies, and that in England, they united therewith the "Charges" of 
Euclid, St. Alban, and Athelstan in a heterogeneous manner; and these are found 
in two, or more, MSS. to which we refer {323} later, as having been approved by 
King Henry VI., and afterwards made the general law. 
   There is one piece of evidence which might enable us to 
settle certain difficult points if we could rely upon it.  Professor Marks, a 
learned Jew, has stated that he saw in one of the public libraries of this 
country a Commentary upon the Koran of the 14th century, written in the Arabic 
language, with Hebrew characters, referring according to his view, to Free 
Masonry, and which contained an anagrammatical sentence of which each line has 
one of the letters M. O. C. H., and which he reads: "We have found our Lord 
Hiram" (Chiram); but the Dervish Sects have a similar phrase, which would read: 
"We have found in our Lord rest" (Kerim, or Cherim).  We must therefore hold our 
minds in reserve until the book has been re-found and examined.  In any case it 
seems to add a link to the chain of evidence as to the Oriental origin of our 
present Rites.  We may feel assured that the Masons who returned from the 
Holy-land were of a class calculated to make a marked impression on the 
Society.  The word to which the foregoing alludes, in modern Arabic, might be 
translated "Child of the Strong one."  Several modern writers, both Masons and 
non-Masons, hold to the opinion that there were two Artists at the building of 
Solomon's temple: Huram the Abiv, who began the work, and Hiram the son, who 
completed what his father had to leave undone.  Succoth, where the brass 
ornaments for the Temple were cast, signifies Booths or Lodges, and Isaradatha 
means sorrow or trouble.<<Vide "Light from the Lebanon Lodge."  Joel 
Nash.>>  Josephus says that Hiram was son of a woman of the tribe of Napthali, 
and that his father was Ur of the Israelites.  The account that we have of him, 
in the Bible, is that he was expert in dyeing, and in working in gold, and in 
brass; which makes him a chemist and metallurgist, rather than a Mason.  There 
were many Arts in which the ancients were our superiors.  A very important {324} 
lecture on this point has recently appeared from the pen of the Rev. Bro. M. 
Rosenbaum. 
   After this long digression we will return to architecture 
in general.  Mr. Wyatt Papworth points out the use of the term Ingeniator, in 
various documents, between 1160-1300 referring to castles repaired or 
constructed.  Some of these were undoubtedly Architects and not Engineers, whose 
duties were the construction of warlike machines; and though gunpowder had not 
yet come into use in this country, the connection with Masoning might, at a 
later period, lead to the introduction of Marcus Graecus into our MSS. 
   In the reign of Edward I., 1272-1307, Merton College in 
Oxford, the cathedral of Norwich and twenty pious houses were founded; the noble 
Gothic style had reached its climax.  Between 1291-4 several crosses were 
erected; and there are mentions of Masons who were employed by the King, some 
items of expense refer to timber, "to make a Lodge for Master Michael and his 
Masons."  Peter de Cavalini designed the "Eleanor Crosses;" the one in Cheapside 
was begun by Richard de Crumble, and completed by Roger de Crumble; it was of 
three stories, decorated with Niches having Statues executed by Alexander le 
Imaginator.  A still more beautiful one was the Charing Cross.  From 1290-1300 
West Kirkby Church was building, and the Marks are recorded by Brother Rylands, 
as well as those of Eastham, and Sefton Churches.<<Ars Quat. Cor. vii.>>  
In 1300 Henry the Monk, surnamed Lathom, Latomus, -- Mason or Stone-cutter, 
rebuilt part of the Abbey of Evesham.  In 1303 the Mayor and 24 Aldermen of 
London, made ordinances for the regulation of the Carpenters, Masons and 
labourers; the Mayor was Gregory de Rokeslie, and the Mazounes Mestres, or 
Master Masons, and Master Carpenters are mentioned, in conjunction with their 
servants.  From 1308-26 William Boyden was employed in erecting The Chapel of 
the Virgin at the Abbey of St. Albans. {325} 
   In the reign of Edward II., 1307-27, Exeter and Oriel 
Colleges in Oxford, Clare Hall in Cambridge, and eight pious houses were built.  
During this King's reign we have the advent of the "Curvilinear," or "Decorated" 
style, which held its ground for near a century.  In 1313 the Knights Templars 
were suppressed with great brutality in France; in England their property was 
confiscated to the Knights of St. John, their leading Preceptories being at 
London, Warwick, Walsden, Lincoln, Lindsey, Bollingbroke, Widine, Agerstone, 
York, Temple-Sowerby, Cambridge, etc.; they were distributed throughout the 
Monasteries, or joined the Knights of St. John; those of York had lenient 
treatment by Archbishop Greenfield, and were relegated to St. Mary's adjacent to 
the Culdee hospital of St. Leonard.  Their Lay brethren, amongst whom would be a 
numerous body of Masons, were liberated; a circumstance from which might spring 
more than a traditional connection.  Some of the Knights returned to Lay 
occupations, and even married to the great annoyance of the Pope.  In Scotland 
the Knights, aided in their aims by the wars between that country and England, 
retained their Preceptories and though they seem to have united with the Order 
of St. John in 1465 they were as often distinguished by one name as the other.  
The Burg-laws of Stirling have the following in 1405, -- "Na Templar sall 
intromet with any merchandise or gudes pertaining to the gilde, be buying and 
selling, within or without their awn lands, but giff he be ane gilde 
brother."<<"Freem. Mag." xvi, p. 31.>>  Thus implying that the Knights 
had actual membership with the Guilds.  The Templars, at the like date (1460) 
are mentioned in Hungary.<<Malczovich -- Ars Quat, Cor. Yarker.  Also 
1904, p. 240.>>  In Portugal their innocence of the charges brought against them 
was accepted, but to please the Pope their name was changed to Knights of 
Christ.  In an old Hungarian town, where the Templars once were, the Arms are a 
wheel on which is the Baptist's head on a charger. {326} 
  A bishop of Durham, circa 1295-1300 named Beke had required 
  more than the accustomed military service from the tenants of St. Cuthbert, 
  who pleaded the privileges of "Haly-werk folc, not to march beyond the Tees or 
  Tyne," and Surtees explains that "Halywerk folc or holywork people, whose 
  business, to wit, was to defend the holy body of St. Cuthbert, in lieu of all 
  other service"<<"Hist. Durham, Genl." xxxiii.>>, are here alluded to, but of 
  Culdee original the term implied an art origin.  Sir James Dalrymple, speaking 
  of Scotland, says, -- "The Culdees continued till the beginning of the 14th 
  century, up to which time they contended for their ancient rights, not only in 
  opposition to the whole power of the primacy, but the additional support of 
  papal authority."  Noted Lodges exist from old times at Culdee seats, such as 
  Kilwinning, Melrose, Aberdeen, and as the period when this was shewn was that 
  of the suppression of the Templars, and the Scotch generally never allowed 
  themselves to be Pope-ridden, we have one reason why the name of Templar was 
  continued in that country.  There was everywhere a growing discontent against 
  the Church of Rome secretly indicated, even in the art of the Masonic 
  Sodalities.  Isaac Disraeli alludes to it in his Curiosities of Literature.  
  In his Chapter entitled, "Expression of Suppressed Opinion," he states that 
  sculptors, and illuminators, shared these opinions, which the multitude dare 
  not express, but which the designers embodied in their work.  Wolfius, in 1300 
  mentions, as in the Abbey of Fulda, the picture of a wolf in a Monk's cowl 
  preaching to a flock of sheep, and the legend, "God is my witness, how I long 
  for you all in my bowels."  A cushion was found in an old Abbey, on which was 
  embroidered a fox preaching to a flock of geese, each with a rosary in its 
  mouth.  On the stone work and columns of the great church at Argentine, as old 
  as 1300, were sculptured wolves, bears, foxes, and other animals carrying 
  holy-water, crucifixes, and tapers, and other things more indelicate.  In a 
  magnificent {327} illuminated Chronicle of Froissart is inscribed several 
  similar subjects, -- a wolf in a Monk's cowl stretching out its paw to bless a 
  cock; a fox dropping beads which a cock is picking up.  In other cases a Pope 
  (we hope Clement V.) is being thrust by devils into a cauldron, and Cardinals 
  are roasting on spits.  He adds that, at a later period, the Reformation 
  produced numerous pictures of the same class in which each party satirised the 
  other.  
     Over the entrance to the Church of St. Genevieve, says 
  James Grant in "Captain of the Guard" (ch. xxxiii.), at Bommel is the 
  sculpture of mitred cat preaching to twelve little mice.  There is a somewhat 
  indecent carving at Stratford upon Avon.  The Incorporated Society of Science, 
  Letters, and Art, in its Journal of January, 1902, contains a paper by Mr. T. 
  Tindall Wildbridge upon the ideographic ornamentation of Gothic buildings.  He 
  observes that there were Masons who possessed the tradition of ancient 
  symbolic formula, and that whilst the Olympic Mythology is almost ignored, the 
  "Subject being (by them) derived from the Zodiacal system," and it is, he 
  observes, that this symbolisation, often satirical, holds place on equal terms 
  with the acknowledged church emblems.  He instances some of these at Oxford 
  and elsewhere, one of which is the symbol of Horus in his shell, and in a 
  second instance reproduced as a "fox" with a bottle of holy water.  The altar 
  of the Church of Doberan in Mecklenburg exhibits the priests grinding dogmas 
  out of a mill.  
     In 1322 Alan de Walsingham restored Ely, himself 
  planning and working at the building.  The 1322 Will of Magister Simon le 
  Masoun of York is printed in the Surtees Society's collection.  Of 1325 is the 
  tomb of Sir John Croke and Lady Alyne his wife at Westley Wanterleys in 
  Cambridgeshire; upon it is the letter N, with a hammer above it, and a 
  half-moon and six-pointed star on each side; the N is an old Mason's mark, and 
  also a pre-Christian Persian Symbol.  Of this period there is a stone-coffin 
  lid at Thornton Abbey in Lincolnshire, which {328} has upon it a shafted 
  floriated Greek cross, and besides the shaft a square -- religion and art 
  united; a similar one occurs at Blidworth in Northamptonshire having upon it a 
  square and axe.  At Halsall in Lancashire is a three-step cross on one side of 
  which is a square, and on the other an ordinary set-square.  There is also in 
  Lincoln Cathedral a gravestone of this century representing Ricardus de 
  Gaynisburg, Cementarius, or Mason, on each side of whom is a trowel, and a 
  square.  Chartres Cathedral in France has a window containing the working 
  tools of masons.  Mr. Wyatt Papworth observes that at the end of the 13th 
  century, and beginning of the 14th, there is mention of the Magister 
  Cementarii and his Socii, or Fellows.  There is documentary evidence of 
  the term Freemason in 1376, and it may have been in use at an earlier date.  
  Brother F. F. Schnitger argues, on the evidence of a Nuremberg work of 1558, 
  that the prefix indicates a free art, as sculpture, which the ancients say 
  that handicraft is not, but that the former is, "the use of the square and 
  compasses artistically."<<Vide "Ars Quat. Cor." ii., p.141.>>  Brother G. W. 
  Speth advocated, with a little hesitancy, that as the travelling Masons moved 
  about they adopted the term "Free" to indicate that they were outside, or free
  from, any Guild but that established under their own Constitution.  
  It does not, necessarily follow, however, that the term "Free" had everywhere 
  the same import.<<"Ibid" vii.>>  
     Scotland has many important documents.  The 
  Chevalier Ramsay, in his Paris Oration of 1737, states that James, Lord 
  Steward of Scotland, in 1286 held a Lodge at Kilwinning and initiated the 
  Earls of Gloucester and Ulster into Freemasonry.  What authority there is for 
  this statement no one now knows, but Tytler in his History of Scotland shows 
  that these two Earls were present at a meeting of the adherents of Robert 
  Bruce at Turnbury Castle, which is about 30 miles west of Kilwinning Abbey, 
  and were concerting plans for the vindication of his claims to the Scottish 
  throne. {329}  
     The rebuilding of Melrose Abbey in Scotland was begun in 
  1326 under King Robert the Bruce, who seems to have been a protector of the 
  Templars.  There is a legend in regard to a window which is said to have been 
  wrought by an Apprentice who was slain by his Master out of jealousy, and the 
  same myth applies to similar work in other countries.  The structure is full 
  of recondite symbolism both within and without; the Chapel is interpreted to 
  represent the human body in all its parts; in Symbols there is a pelican 
  feeding its young, and the phoenix rising from its ashes.  It contains a later 
  inscription on the lintel of the turret stairs, as follows, and there are 
  others of like import: --  
  
                
  "Sa gays ye compass royn aboute,  
                 
  Truith and laute do but doute,  
                 
  Behold to ye hende q. Johne Morvo."  
  
  A second on the west wall of the south transept is a shield 
  inscribed to the next John Moray, or Murray, who was son of Patrick, bearing 
  two pairs of compasses laid across each other between three fleur-de-lis, 
  though his own arms were three mullets, in chief, and a fleur-de-lis in base.  
  The older of the two inscriptions refers to a John Moray who died 1476, a 
  Mason but also Keeper of Newark Castle in 1467; and whose son Patrick had the 
  same status until 1490.  The epitaph of the second of the name is thus read: 
  --<<lbid v, p. 227; also ix, p. 172>>   
  
  "John Morow sum 
  tym callit           -gu Melros and Paslay of  
    was I and 
  born in Parysse           Nyddysdayll and of Galway,  
    certainly an 
  had in kepyng           Pray to God, and Mari baith.  
    all Mason 
  work of Sant An-         And sweet Sant Tohn to keep this  
    droys ye hye 
  Kyrk, of Glas-         haly kirk fra Skailh."  
  
  
  This John Moray had grants of lands from James IV. in 1490 
  and 1497, was Sheriff of Selkirk 1501, and assassinated on his way to the 
  Sheriff's Court in 1510.  
     In the reign of Edward III., 1327-77, we are told by 
  Anderson that Lodges were many and frequent, and that great men were Masons, 
  the King patronising the arts {330} and sciences.  He says that it is 
  implicitly implied, in an old record, "that in the glorious reign of King 
  Edward III., when Lodges were many and frequent, the Grand Master with his 
  Wardens, at the head of Grand Lodge, with consent of the Lords of the Realm, 
  then generally Free-masons, ordained -- That for the future, at the making or 
  admission of a brother, the Constitutions shall be read and the Charges 
  hereunto annexed."  Such specific statement is not at present known and is 
  doubtless a paraphrase of the existing MSS.  The King founded the Abbey of 
  Eastminster, and others built many stately mansions and about thirty pious 
  houses, in spite of all the expensive wars of this reign.  
     The south transept of Gloucester Cathedral was begun 
  about the year 1330, and is traditionally said to be by "John Goure, who built 
  Camden Church and Gloster Towre."  He is believed to be represented in a 
  monument, of which an engraving appears in Ars Quatuor (vol. ii.); it 
  is in form of a Mason's square, and the builder is represented as if 
  supporting it; his arm is in the position of hailing his Fellows; below the 
  man's effigy is a budget of tools.  Until a recent restoration of the ancient 
  Church of the Dominicans in Limerick, there was, on the gable end, the half 
  length figure of a person in Monkish dress; the right hand was clutching the 
  heart, and the left arm, kept close to the side, was raised with the palm 
  outward, index and second finger raised.<<The Kneph. C. M. Wilson, 
  J.P.>>  
     In 1330, Thomas of Canterbury, a Master Mason, began 
  work at St. Stephen's Chapel, Westminster.  The Abbey-gate of Bury St. 
  Edmund's contains the double triangles, and is of this period.  On the carved 
  bosses of a Gothic church at Linlithgow are these emblems: -- (1) a double 
  circle within which is a book upon which are square and compasses; (2) a 
  double square within which are two circles, and in these a double lozenge in 
  the centre of which is the letter G.<<Freem. Mag., May 1853.>>  The 
  brass of John de Bereford at Allhallows, Mayor 1356-7 of Oxford, contains a 
  shield {331} on which are square and compasses.  At Dryburgh Abbey there is a 
  tomb, late this century, on which is a cross-hilted sword, surrounded by a 
  wreath of ivy, and on each side of the sword, the square and compasses; this, 
  and others of like nature, might imply the Initiation of a person of Knightly 
  rank.  
     The condemnation of the 1326 Council of Avignon would 
  seem to have had its influence in England, for upon the "black death" of 1348, 
  when near half the population died, an Ordinance of 1350 confirmed by Statute 
  law in 1360, forbade "all alliances, covines, congregations, chapters, 
  ordinances, and oaths," amongst Masons, Carpenters, and artisans, and this 
  Statute was endorsed by others of a like nature in 1368, 1378, 1414, and 
  1423.  These laws are, however, rather directed against Journeymen, 
  Apprentices, and labourers, and, in any case, from their repetition at long 
  intervals, had little effect upon the Masonic Assemblies.  
     A much more important bearing upon the Masonic 
  organisation is a record of 1356.  At this period there was a dispute in 
  existence between the "Layer Masons or Setters," and the "Mason squarers."  
  Six members of each class appeared before the Mayor, Sheriff, and Aldermen of 
  the city of London, to have their organisation defined in order that the 
  disputes, which had arisen between them might be adjusted, "because that their 
  trades had not been regulated by the folks of their trade in such form as 
  other trades are."  That is, they had not yet been so regulated in the city of 
  London.  Amongst these representatives of the Mason squarers was Henry Yeveley; 
  the "Free-masons" as opposed to the "Layer Masons," who were perhaps derived 
  from the ancient body of the Kingdom, who would suffer in status by French 
  importations, and would prefer, elsewhere, the Saxon Constitution.  The Mayor, 
  after consultation with these two sections, drew up a code of ten rules, which 
  appears in full in Gould's History of Freemasonry, and which virtually 
  allowed the two bodies identical privileges, {332} and rules, mutually with a 
  seven years Apprenticeship.  In either case a Master, taking any work in 
  gross, was to bring 6 or 4 sworn men of the "Ancients" of his trade, to 
  prove his ability and to act as his sureties; and they were to be ruled by 
  sworn Overseers.  Twelve Masters were sworn, which virtually united both 
  bodies, and made a uniform rule for both, thus establishing the London Company 
  of Masons.  Such a union of the Christian Masonry of York and the Semitic 
  Masonry of the Normans, coupled with the grant of Royal Charters to the 
  Masters, might lead to the recognition of the Rites of the Harodim-Rosy Cross 
  as the unification of the two, which it actually is.  It is quite probable 
  that this judicious action of the Mayor saved London a repetition of the 
  disturbances which occurred in France amongst the sects of the Compagnonage.  
     In the middle of the 14th century Ranulf Higden had 
  compiled his Polychronicon in the Benedictine Monastery of St. Werberg, 
  Chester, which is here noted as it constituted the authority for all the 
  Masonic Charges as to Jabal, Jubal, Tubal, and Naamah; Nimrod and his cousin 
  Ashur, the two pillars of Enoch, the origin of Geometry, etc., and which 
  introduced into the Saxon Charge by the author of the "Cooke MS.," whoever 
  that may have been, became the basis of all the later Charges which have come 
  down to us.  
  It is quite probable that the old 17th century Lodge, of 
  which Randle Holmes was a member, dates from the earliest period of Norman 
  architecture in Chester, if not beyond; its prior antiquity is proved by the 
  fact that it had in the 17th century ceased to have any practical object in 
  relation to architecture.  The ancient Scotch Lodges in most cases advance 
  such claims.  
     This era was the beginning of the "Rectilinear" or 
  "Perpendicular" style of architecture, which continued in vogue down to 1550 
  From 1349 works were in progress at Windsor, and John de Spoulee, Master 
  stone-cutter to whom Anderson has given the title of "Master of the {333} 
  Ghiblim," though in Ashmole's Order of the Garter the term used is 
  Stone-cutter, had power given him to impress Masons; he rebuilt St. George's 
  Chapel where the King instituted the Order of the Garter in 1350.  In 1356 
  William of Wykeham, who was made Bishop of Winchester in 1367, was appointed 
  Surveyor, and in 1359 Chief Warden and Surveyor of various castles, and 
  employed 400 Free-Masons at Windsor.  In 1360 the King impressed 360 Masons at 
  his own wages, and attempts were made to punish those who left work, and this 
  is the year in which the Statute law was passed against all alliances, covines, 
  and oaths, so that the one may have influenced the other.  About this year 
  William Edington, Bishop of Winchester, erected a very beautiful church at 
  Edington.  In 1362 writs were issued for the King's works to impress 302 
  Masons and delvers of stone, and the counties of York, Devon, and Salop were 
  to furnish 60 men each.  These arbitrary proceedings of the King have an 
  explanatory bearing upon both the Statute laws and the Masonic Charges.  In 
  1365 Henry Yeveley, already referred to as a Mason-cutter, was director of the 
  work of St. Stephen's Chapel, now the House of Parliament, and according to 
  Anderson is "called at first, in the old Records, the King's Free Mason"; he 
  built for the King the London Charter-house, King's Hall in Cambridge, and 
  Queensborough Castle.  In 1370 William de Wynnesford, Cementarius, was sent 
  beyond sea to retain divers Masons for the service of the King.  In 1375, 
  Robert a Barnham at the head of 250 Free Masons completed St George's great 
  Hall; and Simon Langham, Abbot of Westminster, repaired the body of that 
  cathedral.  
     In Prior Fossour's time, 1341-74, the great West window 
  of Durham Cathedral was placed, and the Altar-screen finished in 1380 to which 
  Lord Neville of Raby contributed 600 marks.  
     Green, in his History of the English People, has 
  some remarks on the English Guilds which we may run over here.  He says that 
  "Frank-Pledge," and the "Frith-Guild" {334} sprang out of kinship and were 
  recognised both by Alfred and Athelstan.  The Merchant Guild of London sprang 
  out of various Guilds in the city which were united into one by Athelstan.  
  But this led to a Craft Guild struggle, for their Wardens had the Inspection 
  of all work done, all tools used and everything necessary for the good of 
  their several trades.  Apart from the Masons who had their own records, not 
  mentioned by Green, the first to secure royal sanction was the weavers who had 
  their charter from Henry I., though the contest went on during the reign of 
  John, for the control of trade in the 11th century had begun to pass from the 
  Merchant Guild to those of the Craft.  It may also be added that the Masons 
  had begun to pass from Monastic control and were becoming secularised.  A 
  constant struggle was taking place between the "Prudhommes," or Wise, and the 
  Commune; those Craftsmen who were unenfranchised united in secret Frith-guilds 
  and Mobs arose, but the open contest did not begin until 1261, when the 
  Craftsmen invaded the Town-mote, set aside the Aldermen and chose Thomas Fitz 
  Thomas for their Mayor.  The contest continued until the time of Edward III., 
  who himself joined the Guild of Armourers.  Charters had now been granted to 
  every trade, and their ordinances duly enrolled in the Mayor's Court, and 
  distinctive Liveries assumed.  Green adds that the wealthier citizens now 
  finding their power broken sought to regain their old influence by enrolling 
  themselves as members of the Trade-guilds (p. 189-95).  
     With the exception of the Masons' Guild at York, which 
  was continuously employed on the Minster, and other churches in York, and as 
  these sent Guilds to other distant parts which ceased to exist when their work 
  was done, it is impossible to trace old Guilds in permanency.  When they had 
  completed their labours they would report to York, and as workmen were 
  required elsewhere, a Guild with the proper complement of Apprentices, 
  Fellows, and Passed Masters would be sent there.  In some cases, in small 
  towns, a remnant would remain in permanence, and {335} it is to such as these 
  that we owe a special Charge distinct from that of the General Assembly.  
     In 1377 the Guilds of London were reconstituted and 
  became known as "Livery Companies," from their special Livery or dress.  In 
  place of "Guild," we now have "Crafts and Mysteries," and for "Aldermen," the 
  Masters or Wardens.  The Masons had sent 4 members and the Free Masons 2 
  members to the Municipal Council, but an old list shews that this distinction 
  had been done away with and an erasure is made to credit the delegates as 
  "Masons."  The oath of the Wardens is preserved; they swore, well and truly to 
  Oversee the Craft of Masonry, to observe its rules, and to bring all 
  defaulters before the Chamberlain of the City; to spare no man for favour, nor 
  grieve any man for hate; to commit neither extortion nor wrong, nor in 
  anything to be against the peace of the King or city.  The Oath concludes, as 
  in the French formula before mentioned, "So help you God and all Syntes."  The 
  title of the London Company of Masons, at this time, was "The Craft and 
  Fellowship of Masons."  The Court Rolls of the Manor of Long Benynton, 
  county of Lincoln, the lord being Thomas of Woodstock, the youngest son of 
  Edward III., has John Playster and John Freemason in this year.<<Coleman's 
  Catalogue, 1882, xviii, No. 150.>> The Charters of City Companies of 
  Masons was clearly a legalised usurpation of the Saxon right of Assembly, and 
  modelled upon the older "Fraternities" of France; where such City Companies 
  were chartered the result might be the withdrawal of the Masters into the 
  Livery, leading to the continuation of the Assembly by journeymen and 
  amateurs.  To put the question in other words, some Assemblies may have become 
  Livery Companies, whilst York, and other northern towns, continued the ancient 
  right of Masonic Assembly; and in regard to this the views of Brother Speth 
  that the Masonic Assembly, and the Charges belonging thereto, is a claim that 
  they were free from the Guilds is worthy of close consideration.  
  Brother Gould {336} has mentioned several instances where Journeymen attempted 
  to establish Guilds for their own enjoyment and protection, but were speedily 
  suppressed by the Masters; in 1387 three Cordwainers had been promised a Papal 
  brief for this purpose, but only obtained the privilege of the London prison 
  of Newgate; a similar attempt of the Journeymen Saddlers was suppressed in 
  1396; the same befel the Journeymen Tailors in 1415; also the Journeymen Guild 
  of St. George at Coventry in 1427.  Unfortunately all the documents of the 
  London Company of Masons prior to 1620 have been lost, or we should have had 
  valuable information as to the working of that Guild.  Brother Edward Conder 
  has shewn that the Company at the earliest period of its records had a 
  speculative Lodge meeting at its hall, which was not confined to Masons by 
  profession; and that a Master's grade such as is spoken of in the "Regius" and 
  "Cooke" MSS. was the appanage of the Fellowship, by which "accepted" or 
  non-operatives became qualified for the rank of Liverymen and Assistants who 
  composed the governing Council, and thus the esoteric or symbolic branch was 
  allied with the exoteric one on the Council.  
     We will now return, in a few notes, to works in progress 
  at this period.  In the reign of Richard II., 1377-99, about fifteen pious 
  houses were built. Between 1380-86 the building of the new College, in Oxford, 
  was accomplished by William of Wykeham; the Wardens and Fellows, 14th April, 
  1386, made solemn entrance, marching in procession with the cross borne before 
  them and chanting Litanies.  Between 1387-93 the same architect founded 
  Winchester College; it contains the arms of the Architect, which have a 
  peculiarity worthy of notice; they are -- two chevronels or carpenters' 
  couples between three roses; motto, Manners makyth man.  It is probably but a 
  coincidence that if we reverse a Master Mason's apron, it is a copy of the 
  arms of Wykeham, whilst the motto, as previously noted, is found in the "Regius" 
  MS., and in a book on etiquette styled "Urbanitatis," of which it is {337} 
  possible he may have been author.  His Master Mason was William de Wynnesford, 
  mentioned here in 1370, and his portrait as William Wynfor, lathomus, 
  appears in stained glass, with that of the Master Carpenter, and Dominus Simon 
  Membury, Supervisor or Clerk of the Works.  In the old Masonic Charges there 
  is a law that no Fellow shall go into the town at night, without a Fellow to 
  bear him company, as witness of his good conduct; and Brother F. Compton 
  Price, who has executed the beautiful facsimiles of Masonic MSS., points out 
  that Wykeham had the same law for the Monks and Canons, who were prohibited 
  from going abroad without leave of the Prior, and without a Companion.  
     From 1389-91 the celebrated poet Geoffrey Chaucer, was 
  Clerk of the Works over the King's Masons, and it is possible that our old 
  Charges may have had some influence upon his poetical works.  Romsey Abbey has 
  a pillar in the south aisle, upon the capital of which is sculptured certain 
  figures supposed to represent the Dedicators of the Church; it has a trowel 
  and a large square said to contain the words: "Rohert me fecit."  Between the 
  years 1389-91 two very beautiful churches were erected, one at the village of 
  Shottesbrook in Berkshire, and the other at Winnington in Beds, but the 
  "Perpendicular "style had not reached these places.  St. Michael's Church in 
  Coventry was completed in 1395; St. Nicholas in Lynn, 1400; the Collegiate 
  Church in Manchester was in progress, and it has been supposed the builders 
  met at the adjacent "Seven Stars," a very ancient hostelry.  
     Works were in constant progress at York from 1349-99, 
  and even down to 1520.  In the year 1352, the Chapter of the Minster issued 
  regulations for the Masons employed, which are interesting in themselves, and 
  indicate to us various particulars which shew how carefully old Masonic 
  customs have been handed down to us.  It would be an error to suppose that 
  such Lodges as are described herein were the York Assembly; that body was an 
  annual Assembly drawn from all the Masons within a wide circle.  {338} Such 
  Lodges might possibly receive Apprentices.  The document from which we quote 
  the following particulars is part of the Fabric Rolls, printed by the 
  Surtees' Society: 1352, "The first and second Masons, who are Masters of the 
  same, and the Carpenters," took an oath to carry out these regulations.  After 
  work, between May and August, breakfast was to last half an hour, "and then 
  the aforesaid Masters, or one of them, shall knock upon the door of the lodge, 
  and forthwith all shall go to their work."  After dinner they shall sleep 
  within their lodge, and when the Vicars have come from the Canons' dinner 
  table, the Master Mason, or his substitute, shall cause them to rise and come 
  to their work.  Then they were to work from the first bell for Vespers, and 
  then drink within the lodge until the third bell of St. Mary's Abbey called le 
  longe bell.  "The aforesaid two Master Masons and Carpenters of the Fabric 
  shall be present at each drinking time, and these shall notify to the Keeper 
  of the Fabric, and to the Controller thereof, all failures and absences."  
     In 1370 the Dean and Chapter issued another Code of 
  regulations under which none were allowed to go away above a mile, under 
  penalty of a fine.  A new workman was to be tested for a week, and if "he is 
  foundyn conisant of his werke, be recayde ye commune assent of ye Mayster, and 
  ye Keper of ye werke and of ye Mastyr Masoun, shall swere upon ye boke yet he 
  shall trewle ande bysili at his poure, for out anye manner gylary, fayntis, 
  outher desayte, hald, and kepe holy, all ye poyntes of ys forsayde ordinance 
  in all thynges yt him touches or may touche, fra tyme yt he be recavyde."  In 
  this same year Master Robert de Patryngton, and 12 Masons appeared and 
  received Articles to this tenor: - "Lords, if it be your wyles, we grant for 
  to stand at our workes trewly, and at our power."  In the following year we 
  find that this Master had under him 35 Masons and Apprentices, 18 labourers, 
  and the church found them Livery of tunics, aprons, gloves, and clogs. {339}  
     In 1389 the Masters and Wardens of Guilds were ordered 
  by the Crown to make a return of their laws, oaths, feasts, meetings, and if 
  they possessed charters to  produce them, and the existence of both social and 
  Craft Guilds is admitted by issue of separate writs.  A body such as the 
  London Fellowship of Masons, says Bro. R. F. Gould, would not be affected by 
  such writs, for it had the governance of the London Craft, and Anderson 
  expresses an opinion, in 1723, that its members had first been received 
  according to well-known Masonic forms.  Masons in many parts, who had no 
  Charters, would no doubt be affected by the Writs of 1389, and it is very 
  probable that the order may have led to the compilation of a series of 
  Constitutional Charges, which were, again and again, recopied and handed down 
  to us in later MSS.; but it is clear that such scribes did not hesitate, at 
  any time, to introduce supposed improvements of their own.  Whether or not 
  such a recompilation originated thus, the laws of the country shew that 
  Assemblies continued to be held down to the 15th century, and Masonic 
  documents prove their later continuance, and the variations in the MSS. lead 
  us to believe that if there were Masons who preferred a Norman French Charge, 
  there were others who preferred their ancient Saxon privilege of a right of 
  Assembly to obligate Fellows, and pass Masters, and we will give particulars 
  of two such documents shortly, both of which embrace legends of this date.  
     We will now say a little upon the Symbolism of the time 
  both English and Foreign.  Dr. Inman, of Liverpool<<"Ancient Faiths in Ancient 
  Names.", has the following: -- "The ancient parish church of Bebington, 
  Cheshire, has not only the solar wheel, the spikes of which terminate in the 
  phallic triad, as one of the adornments of the reredos, but abounds with 
  deltas, acorns, Maltese crosses, enfolding triangles, and Virgins who, like 
  the ancient Isis, are crowned with the inverted crescent, the chaplet being 
  still further adorned with the  {340} seven planets."  A very interesting 
  series of Marks, cut between 1120-1534 has been collected by Brother Rylands.<<"Ars 
  Quat. Cor." 1894.>>  At Great Waltham there are some well carved panel heads 
  of open seats, the tops of which in triplicated form contain the five-pointed 
  star, with a ball in the centre.  The pavement of Westminster Abbey contains 
  the double triangle, each angle containing a small one, whilst three triangles 
  separated appear in the centre.  During last century certain leaden medals 
  designated Moralli were disinterred at Dover, and believed to be 
  travelling tokens from one Monastery to another, ensuring welcome, some bore a 
  five-pointed star, others had a dot at each angle, and the letter G in the 
  centre.<<Feem. Mag., 1863, viii, p. 86.>>  Masons as a necessity were 
  travellers, and could not carry work to their shop.  The Rev. Bro. A. F. A. 
  Woodford, whose ability as a Masonic authority is unquestioned, has several 
  times stated in print that there was found in the Minster Yard in York an 
  ancient token or seal, undoubtedly of the 14th century, which had upon it 
  words only known to Masons and Hiramites.  
     By a Statute of Henry VI. (1406) the Liverymen of Guilds 
  were permitted to wear girdles of silk, embroidered with silver and gold.  The 
  date to the Will of John Cadeby is indecipherable, but earlier than 1451, as 
  one of the persons mentioned in it died in that year.  Bro. G. F. Fort in his 
  treatise on builders' marks quotes Matthew of Arras and Peter Arler, whose 
  images in the Cathedral of Prague, of the end of the 14th century, wear in the 
  former case his mark on a keystone set in a semi-circle, depending from 
  a broad band of blue, and Peter Arler's is a perfect square.  A Guild Mason 
  would say that the Mark of Matthew of Arras proves him to have belonged to an 
  "Arch" Guild, though blue is a Craft colour.  
     The inventory of the Will here named of John Cadeby, of 
  Beverley, Mason, has mention of several Zonas, which though literally girdles, 
  may be interpreted Aprons: -- {341}  
     One silk 
  zona, green and red, silver mounted, weight 17 oz., 32s. 8d.  
     One silk 
  zona, silver mounted, with leaves and ivy, weighs 7 1/4 oz., 40s. 8d.  
     One silk 
  zona, silver mounted, with Roses, weighs 9 3/4 oz., 16s. 3d  
     One damaged 
  silk zona, silver mounted, with letters B and I in the middle, weight . . . .  
     One zona, of 
  mixture, silvered, ornamented with stars, 3s  
     One zona, of 
  black and green silk, weight 3 oz., 3s  
     The Girdle, 
  then an article of clothing in general use, was appropriate to a Master.  
      The foreign churches of the 14th century are equally 
  suggestive in Symbolism common to Masonry.  The dome of Wurtzburg, in front of 
  the chamber of the dead, has two columns, which are supposed to date from 104o 
  but may be later; on one is the letters IAC-HION, and BOO-Z.  There is an old 
  church in Hanover which was building from 1284-1350, and which contains the 
  circle, double triangles, and pentagon; in this church is also a statue of St. 
  George with the red cross, and one of St. James the Pilgrim; at one time it 
  possessed a charger with the Baptist's head; an inscription says: "The fire 
  was a sore thorn to Stoics and Hebrews," which a Chronicle of 1695 refers to 
  the fact of the burning of the Templars, 1310-3, a remark which would seem to 
  imply a belief that these Knights were guilty of Monotheistic heresy.  
  Hargrave Jennings says that in old representations of the Cathedral of Notre 
  Dame in Paris, the sun and moon, with other emblems, are placed respectively 
  on the two porches.  
      The Church of Doberan has many double triangles, placed 
  in a significant manner; three vine-leaves united by a cord, and symbolic 
  cyphers; there is also a painting in the same church, in which the Apostles 
  are represented in Masonic attitudes.<<Hist. Freem. J. G. Findel.>>  
  Fort asserts that in one of the churches of Florence are life size figures in 
  Masonic attitudes.  Many paintings of the old Masters are said to {342} 
  exhibit similar characteristics.  The Church of Santa Croce, Florence, over 
  the main portal has a figure of Christ, holding in the hand a perfect square; 
  he it was who told Peter that "upon this stone (petra) I will build my 
  church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."  Clavel states 
  that the figure of Christ in the Church of St. Denis has the hand placed in a 
  position well known to Freemasons; at the beginning of this chapter we gave 
  other information hereon.  The Abbey Church of St. Owen in Rouen begun in 
  1318, and completed by Alexander Berneval, who died in 1440 and was buried in 
  the church, has a legend in regard to a very fine Rose-window which is 
  identical with that of Melrose; the five-pointed star appears in the stone 
  tracery, and Murray says that there is a tradition that it was made by an 
  Apprentice whom Berneval, the Master mason, slew out of jealousy because he 
  had surpassed himself.  Other edifices at Rouen contain the pentagon.  This 
  general identity of Symbolism in various countries tends to prove a secret 
  understanding amongst all Masons as to its meaning, and a similar Initiation 
  of the builders everywhere, which as they travelled about ensured a brotherly 
  welcome.  
     Victor Hugo in his novel of Notre Dame says that 
  "there is an intimate connection between architecture and the Hermetic 
  philosophy."  He further alleges an alchemical symbolism in the sculpture 
  attributed to Bishop William of Parys in the great Portal; he also instances 
  the Virgins with their lamps turned down, and those turned up; the opening of 
  the book (of philosophy); some naked figures at the foot of Mary; one with 
  wings on the heels (Mercury); the Sower; Job (the philosopher's stone, 
  tortured to become perfect); a dragon with its tail in a bath from which rises 
  smoke and a king's head, demons and dragon's head; and Abraham offering his 
  son Isaac.  
     In the reign of Henry IV., 1399-1413, six pious houses 
  were built; the Londoners erected their Guild Hall, and the King founded 
  Battle Abbey in Shrewsbury, and afterwards that of Fotheringay.  In 1399 Hugh 
  de Hedon {343} had employed at York 28 Masons; but fuller information will be 
  found in the Fabric Rolls.  
     In the reign of Henry V., 1413-22, eight pious houses 
  were built, and the King rebuilt the palace, and the Abbey of Sheen, under the 
  direction of Henry Chichley, Archbishop of Canterbury.  At York, "our dred 
  lord the King" had, in 1416, given them William de Colchester from Westminster 
  Abbey; the appointment must have been an unpopular one, for, in the third year 
  of his Mastership, certain stone-cutters assaulted and did grievously injure 
  him and his assistant; the work continued here down to 1520.  Cattrick Bridge 
  was constructed in 1413, and the three Masons were to have a gown "according 
  to their degree," but this will mean employment rank.  Cattrick Church was 
  begun in 1421, and the Masons were to have "a Luge of tre," with four rooms of 
  "syelles," and of two "henforkes."  
     The reign of Henry VI. lasted from 1422-61, and he was 
  an infant upon his succession.  It is tolerably certain that in his reign the 
  Masons were dabblers in the Hermetic sciences.  During the time of Henry IV. 
  Alchemy was made felony, by an act of 1404, which continued in force during 
  the reign of Henry V.   Henry VI. took the art under his protection and 
  obtained the consent of Parliament, empowering three Lancashire gentlemen, 
  "lovers of truth and haters of deception," to practise the art.<<Vide 
  Scientific and Relig. Mysteries.  Yarker. 1872. p. 62.>>  An Act of 
  Parliament was passed in 1425 alleging that by the "yearly congregations and 
  confederacies of the Masons in their general Chapters assembled," the good 
  effect of the Statutes of labourers was violated and prohibited all such 
  meetings; no effect was given to this act, and it remained a dead letter on 
  the Statute book until the reign of Queen Elizabeth, when it passed into 
  oblivion, being annulled by other Acts.  
     In 1424 Prior Wessington repaired the tower of Durham 
  Cathedral, and spent  1,454 Pounds of the money of the time.  
     In 1426 the Masons erecting Walberswick steeple were 
  {344} to be provided with a house to work in, to eat and drink, and to lie in 
  and to make "mete" in, to be built near the place of working.  In 1427, 
  William of Warmington began the rebuilding of the western tower of Croyland 
  Abbey, and the vaulting with stone of the north aisle; his memorial stone, 
  which has been engraved in Ars Quatuor<<A.Q.C. v, p. 146.>>, 
  represents him as holding a square in his right hand, and a pair of compasses 
  in his left; there are other Masonic symbols carved here, for which consult 
  the reference under the date 1113.  There was a Lodge of Masons attached to 
  the Priory of Canterbury at this time; as the Register of William Molash, in 
  1429, mentions Thomas Stapylton, the Master, John Morys the Custos, or Warden, 
  both of whom rank as Esquires; and 16 Masons; all receive their livery, or 
  clothing.  Chichley also had livery, and these extracts prove that Christ 
  Church Convent had a considerable body of Masons working at the building.  St. 
  Mary's Church, Bury, was begun 1424.  
     In the contract with Horwood for building the Nave of 
  Fotheringay Church in 1434 it is enacted, "that if the two said letters, or 
  any of them, be noght profitable ne suffisant workmen for the lordys availle, 
  then by oversight of Master Masons of the countie, they shall be denyd."  If 
  Horwood did not fulfill his engagements, "he shall yielde his body to prison 
  at my lordy's will (Duke of York), and all his moveable goods and heritages be 
  at my said lordy's disposition and ordinance."  In 1439 the Abbot of St. 
  Edmundsbury contracts with John Wood for the restoration of the great bell 
  tower, "in all manere of things that longe to Free-masonry, and to have borde 
  for himself as a gentleman, and his servant as a yeoman, and thereby two robys, 
  one for himselfe after a gentleman's livery."<<Archaelogia, xxiii, p. 
  331.>> Southwold Church was begun 1440.  
     In 1436 an Act was passed which required the Masters, 
  Wardens, people of the Guilds, fraternities, and other companies incorporate, 
  to produce their letters Patent to the Justices and others, where such Guilds 
  and fraternities {345} be, for their approval.  This Act is directed against 
  such bodies making their own laws, and it mentions the Chief Master as 
  distinct from the Masons under him.  It is a very valid supposition that it 
  was this circumstance which led to the production of the Masonic Constitution 
  for the sanction of the King, as several old copies known last century assert 
  that it was.  It has been suggested that the King's Master Mason of our large 
  cities might be the head of the Masonic Assemblies to whom the rest were 
  responsible.  
     There is a Catechism purporting to be the examination of 
  a Freemason by Henry VI., which admits Occult studies; it was given to the 
  world last century under the name of the antiquaries Leland and John Locke, 
  and though possibly a forgery, in its present shape may have been the actual 
  Catechism of some lodge given to these studies.  There, is, however, ancient 
  and genuine testimony to the practice of Alchemy by the Masons.  We instanced 
  in our Chapter (VI.) on the Hermetic Schools, the nature of the Symbolism of 
  Jacques Coeur, 1450 and that of Basil Valentine.  Whatever uncertainty there 
  may be about this there is none in the fact that Thomas Norton classes the 
  Free Masons by name as giving themselves to Alchemical studies.  One Richard 
  Carter in this year 1476, had granted him a license to practise Alchemy.  
     During this reign Wainfleet, Bishop of Winchester, and 
  Archbishop Chichley superintended the erection of various buildings in Oxford, 
  Cambridge, and others built twelve pious houses.  Fuller says of King's 
  College in Cambridge, founded by Henry VI., in 1441, that it is "one of the 
  rarest fabrics in Christendom."  Churches begun, St. Mary's Redcliffe, 1440; 
  Tattershall 1455.  
     In Scotland William St. Clair built Roslyn Chapel in 
  1445, and Mr. James Ferguson considers that the builders were from North 
  Spain.  Within it is a very beautiful Pillar called the Prentice's Pillar, to 
  which a legend is attached which says that whilst the Master went to Rome for 
  instruction, an Apprentice completed the work in his {346} absence and that 
  out of envy at seeing the beauty of the workmanship he slew the Apprentice by 
  a blow on the forehead.  Three heads are shewn in the Chapel as representing 
  those of the Master, the Apprentice, and the widowed Mother, but it has been 
  suggested that they may equally represent Joseph, Jesus, and Mary, in their 
  application to the Rites of Harodim-Rosy Cross.  A similar Apprentice legend 
  is attached to Cologne, Strasburg, Rouen, Melrose, Lincoln, and to other 
  places, and though it has a distinct esoteric reference easily understood by 
  all Masons, may possibly be carried forward to an Asiatic superstition that a 
  building intended to endure must be cemented by the sacrifice of life.  
  Brother Speth is of opinion that in addition to a foundation-sacrifice, 
  previously mentioned, there was a completion-sacrifice made at the crowning of 
  the edifice, and that it was a custom obtaining amongst the Teutonic and other 
  races, of which he gives many examples.  
     Two documents, actually copied at this period, deserve 
  ample reference here; one is the "Cooke MS.," written about 1450; and of the 
  other there are several duplicates, the "Wm. Watson MS.," which we shall take 
  as our reference; the duplicates being the "Heade MS.," dated 1675; another is 
  quoted by Dr. Plot in 1686, and Dr. James Anderson, between 1723-38 had seen a 
  copy.  Bro. Dr. W. W. Begemann has investigated the "Cooke MS.," and considers 
  that it is copied from one about the year 1410, whilst the second part or book 
  of Charges is much earlier, by at least a century; the Preface being compiled 
  in a west Midland County.  Upon the "Watson MS., a valuable Commentary by 
  Brother C. C. Howard, of Picton, has been printed, with a facsimile, and he 
  shews very forcibly that it is a more complete and unabridged version than the 
  Preface to the "Cooke MS.," but this also has been taken from a copy at least 
  three removes from the original compilation, which served both for the "Cooke" 
  and the "Watson" MSS., which again might be amplified copies of still older 
  MSS.  It is probable that {347} modifications may have been made to adapt it 
  for presentation to Henry VI., and the "Lords of his honourable Council," 
  about the year 1442; and it may have been slightly modified in the next reign, 
  when again copied, as little changes are made in all copies, no two being 
  verbally alike.  It will be convenient to place the two copies side by side, 
  and to distinguish where the variations occur, to suit them to two different 
  Masonic schools.  
     These MSS. begin with a description of the Seven Liberal 
  Arts and Sciences, upon which all Crafts in the world were founded, and 
  especially Geometry, which is the basis of all other arts, for there is "no 
  handicraft but it is wrought by Geometry."  The author's legendary origin of 
  the Craft begins with Adam, -- before Noah's flood there was a man called 
  Lamech who had two wives, -- "one hight Adah, and another Zillah, by the first 
  wife, that hight Adah he begat two sons, that hight Jabal, and the other hight 
  Jubal."  Jabal was "Cain's Master Mason and governor of all his works, when he 
  made the city of Enoch, that was the first city."  Jubal was the founder of 
  Music.  "Lamech begat upon his other wife, that hight Zillah.  . . . Tubal 
  Cain . . . and his daughter Naamah. . . . This son Tubal Cain was the founder 
  of Smith's Craft. . . Naamah was the founder of weaver's Craft."  Being 
  forewarned of the deluge they wrote the sciences upon two manner of stones, 
  marble and latres, one of which would not burn, nor the other sink.  "A great 
  clerk that was called Putugoras found that one, and Hermes the philosopher, 
  found the other."  Nimrod began to build the tower of Babel and taught the 
  workmen Craft of measures, and had 40 thousand Masons whom he loved and 
  cherished well.  Nimrod sent to his cousin Asur 30 hundred of Masons, and gave 
  them a Charge.  Abraham "a wise man and a great clerk" taught Geometry to the 
  Egyptians, and had a worthy clerk called Euclid as his pupil.  A relation, 
  varied in terms, from the more ancient form, is given as to Euclid's 
  governance.  The author then tells us that the Children {348} of Israel 
  learned Masonry when they were in Egypt, that "King David loved well Masons, 
  and he grave them (Charges) right nigh as they be now" and "Solomon confirmed 
  the Charges that David his father had given to Masons."  Thence the worthy 
  Science passed into France where was a worthy King called Charles the Second; 
  "he was a Mason before he was a King and gave them Charges."  Up to this point 
  the two MSS. are in perfect agreement, allowing for copyist's errors, but they 
  now diverge in a remarkable manner, and we give a summary, side by side, the 
  "Watson" MS. complete in itself, the "Cooke" having an older part attached: --  
  
  
    
      | 
       WATSON 
      MS.   
        
      
            In 
        the Watson MS. the account given of a charge by St. Alban is very full.  
        It gives Athelstan for authority that "Amphabell came out of France," 
        and converted St. Alban to Christendom, he was Steward of the King 
        and built the walls of Verulam; cherished Masons, and "made them good 
        pay," and gave Charges "as Amphabell had    
      
        brought 
        them out of France."      
      
      
           Edwin 
        (son of Athelstan) purchased from his father the right of Assembly and 
        "correction within themselves," and held an Assembly at York.           
      
      
           The 
        style of Cbarges differ from the "Cooke MS.," and yet allusions are made 
        in these legends to "Books of Charges," as if existing, which 
        embrace Nimrod, Solomon, Euclid, St. Alban, Athelstan.          
      
      
           A 
        general series of Charges has been collected out of these, which do not 
        differ so much in substance from the Saxon Charge, as they are 
        differently arranged.  Certain of the Points, such as duty to 
        King, and             
      
        Church, 
        and Employers, are Charges to "Masons in general."  There is also no 
        distinction between Masters ARTICLES, and Fellows POINTS, but this 
        might be work of a later Scribe.       
      
      
           
        Stewards of the Lodge, Chamber, or Hall, are mentioned as in the "Regius 
        MS." The "Cooke MS." may have an imperfection, as the duties appear but 
        not the word Steward, to which evidently the duties are intended to 
        apply.  
       | 
      
       COOKE MS. 
        
      
            In 
        the Cook MS. the Charge and account of St. Alban is much abridged.  It 
        says "soon after that came St. Adhabell into England, and converted St. 
        Alban to Christianity, who gave them Charges," . . . "And after that 
        there was a worthy King in England that was called Athelstan, and his 
        youngest son  
      
        loved 
        well the Science of Geometry, . . . wherefore he drew him to Council and 
        learned the practice of that Science to his speculative, for of 
        speculative he was a Master, and he loved well Masonry and Masons." It 
        is an abridgement of the "Watson MS.," and goes on to say that this 
        unnamed son purchased a free Patent of the King "that they should make 
        Assembly when they saw a reasonable time."   This omission of the son's 
        name, partially avoids   
      
      
      
      
      
        a 
        difficulty, as Athelstan had no son, but he had a younger brother Edwin, 
        who went to sea in a leaky boat and was drowned, and in later times 
        attempts were made to fix his death upon King Athelstan.  The MS. 
        concludes with the remark that as to the manner of Assembly "as it is 
        written and taught in the Book of our Charges wherefore I leave it at 
        this time."  
      
      
            The 
        author attaches an actual Book of Charges, which is admittedly of 
        an older date than the Preface of the MS. to the point at which it 
        leaves off.  
      
      
      
      
       | 
     
   
  
 
     The closing 
  lines, which precede the Charges of the "Watson MS." are as follows: -- "These 
  Charges have been seen and perused by our late Soveraigne Lord King 
  Henry ye Sixth, and ye Lords of ye Honourable Councell, and they have allowed 
  them well, and said they were right good and reasonable to be holden; and 
  these Charges have been drawn and gathered out of divers ancient books, both 
  of ye old Law, and new Law, as they were confirmed and made in Egypt, by ye 
  King, and ye great Clerk Euclidus, and at ye making of Solomon's temple by 
  King David and Salom his sonn, and in England by St. Alban, who was ye King's 
  Steward yt was at yt time, and afterwards by King Ethelstone yt was King of 
  England, and his son Edwin yt was King after his father, as it is rehearsed in 
  many and diverse histories and stories and Chapters."  
     To some extent the false chronology of these MSS. might 
  be reconciled if we substitute Hermes for Euclid, {350} and Chaldeans for 
  Abraham, but this latter would only be correct at a certain period of Egyptian 
  history, when the Shepherd Kings were in power, and scarcely historically 
  accurate.  The chronology has been disarranged apparently by adding the Euclid 
  Charge in a document to which it does not belong.  The introduction into the 
  Albanus legend of Amphibulus with Charges from France, betrays the work of an 
  Anglo-Norman, for Britain supplied France with Artisans at that remote 
  period.  The whole basis of the "Watson MS." and the first part of the "Cooke 
  MS.," point to a French original, and the laws might be considered more 
  applicable, as given in the "Watson MS.," to a Chartered Company which had the 
  supervision of Lodges of the Craft; we consider, as we have before stated, 
  that the "Watson MS.," may represent the union of two Sects, and the 
  amalgamation of their Constitutional Charges.  Our learned Brother the late W. 
  H. Upton, Past Grand Master of Washington, U.S.A., thinks that Hermes may have 
  been first described as "Lucis Pater," and that Euclid may have been described 
  as pupil of Hermes, until some one destroyed the context by interpolating 
  Abraham.  In reference to the Alban legend he supposes that Amphibalus may be 
  a later gloss; and that the Saxon text might be accommodated thus, -- "the 
  good rule of Masonry was destroyed until the time of Knight Athelstan (a 
  worthy son of King Edward), and he brought the land into good rest and peace, 
  and he (Athelstan) loved Masons more than his father."  The Edwin legend thus 
  arising by substitution of the short Edwd. of the father.  He would restore 
  the Saxon thus, -- or tid cnihte aedlstanes daegs hwele weorthfull sunne 
  cyninge Eadwearde waes, ond se sunu brohte . . . ond he lufode Craeftinga mare 
  d oune his faedr (Eddwd.).  Other emendations will be found noticed in the 
  Appendix, with which we close this book.  
     Architecture is said to have been much neglected during 
  the 17 years of the Wars of the Roses, but in the reign of {351} Edward IV., 
  1461-83, the walls of London were rebuilt, and seven pious houses erected.  
  Wakefield Church, Yorkshire, was begun in 1470; St. Stephen's, Bristol, same 
  year; Blithborough Church, Suffolk, was completed in 1472,; St. Laurence, 
  Norwich, in the same year; Swaffham, Norfolk, 1474; St. Mary's, Oxford, and 
  St. Mary's, Cambridge, in 1478; Long Melford, Suffolk, 1481.  Heswell Church 
  tower, Cheshire, was in course of erection, and its Masons' Marks were printed 
  in 1894 by Brother Rylands.  The King in 1475 expresses general disapprobation 
  against "the giving of livries, signs, tokens, retainers of indenture, 
  promises, oaths, and writings," and this is about the date when the 
  original of the "Watson MS." was made.  John Islip, Abbot of Westminster, 
  finished the repair of the Abbey in 1483.  In 1472 "the hole Craft and 
  Felawship of Masons" had coat armour granted, -- "sable, a chevron argent 
  engrailed, between three castles, garnished with doors and windows of the 
  field, on the chevron a compass, sable.  Crest, -- A castle triple towered as 
  in the arms."  The oldest motto, -- God is our guide, which later gave place 
  to this, -- In the Lord is all our trust.  With slight differences the Lodges 
  generally adopted these arms.  Brother Conder informs us that the Company, at 
  one time, possessed the Constitutions of the Fellowship, presented to them in 
  the Mayorality of John Brown in 1481; these were the laws of their own body as 
  a Company, but are now lost.  
     Germany. It is known that the Emperor Rudolph I. 
  even in the year 1275, authorised an Order of Masons, whilst Pope Nicholas 
  III. in the year 1278 granted to the Brotherhood of Stonemasons at Strasburg, 
  a letter of Indulgence which was renewed by all his successors down to 
  Benedict XII. in 1340.  The oldest order of German Masons arises in 1397, next 
  follow the so-called Vienna witnesses of 1412, 1434, 1435.  Then the Strasburg 
  Order of Lodges in 1464; that of Torgau 1462, and finally 16 different orders 
  on to 1500, and the following centuries, for Spiers, Regensburg, Saxony, 
  Altenburg, Strassburg, {352} Oesterrich, and Ungarn.  "Geschichte der 
  Freimaurerei in Oesterreich und Ungarn, Ludwig Abafi, Budapest, 1890-1).  
  The German statutes of Ratisbon 1459 and of Strasburg 1464, confirmed by the 
  Emperor Maximilian I. on the 1st May, 1498, are but a more ornate version of 
  those of England.  They were to be kept secret by the Master upon his Oath, 
  and were his authority, as he had Charge of the (Contribution) book, and they 
  were to be read yearly to the Fellows in the Lodge, and the "Brotherhood book" 
  of 1563 mentions 22 towns where copies were kept.  This book contains the 
  following: -- LIV. . . . .  
  
  
    "Every 
    Apprentice when he has served his time, and is declared free, shall promise 
    the Craft, on his troth and honor, in lieu of oath, under pain of losing his 
    right to practise Masonry, that he will disclose or communicate the Masons' 
    greeting and grip to no one, except "to him to whom he may justly 
    communicate it, and also that he will write nothing whatever."  LVI. . . . 
    "And every Master having aforesaid Apprentices, shall earnestly enjoin and 
    invite each one when he has thus completed the above written five years to 
    become a Brother by the Oath which such one has taken to the Craft, and is 
    offered to each." 
   
     Vicentius in the "Mirrour of the World." printed by 
  Caxton in 1480, contains short descriptions of the Seven Liberal Arts and 
  Sciences, similar to the description in the Masonic Charges, but adding to 
  each an explanatory woodcut.  A book was published by Veldener in Holland in 
  1486 which is said to contain symbolism of Craft and Egyptian Initiation.  
     The book of Ludwig Abafi says of Bohemia and Hungary 
  that they had other Mystic Brotherhoods "Die Bruder von Reif und Hammer" -- 
  Brothers of the Circle and Hammer.  "Die Hackbruderschaft" -- Brotherhood of 
  the Hatchett.  "Die Freund vom Kreuz" -- Friends of the Cross, which spread to 
  Netherlands and were still holding meetings in 1785 in Wallachia, 
  Transylvania, and other places.  {353}  
     The Torgau Ordinances of 1462 indicate clearly the 
  German qualification for granting a Mark, enacting, in Article 94, that no 
  Fellow shall qualify if he "has not served his time or has bought his Mark, 
  and not honestly earned it."  By Article 25, at his Freedom he demanded a Mark 
  from his Workmaster, and had to make a payment for the service of God.  
  Article 12 enacts that if any one communed with a harlot he should retire from 
  the Lodge, "so far as one may cast a gavel."  
     Of the reign of Richard III., 1483-5, nothing noteworthy 
  is recorded.  
     In the reign of Henry VII., 1485-1509, various royal 
  works were in progress, and about six pious houses were built.  Reginald Bray, 
  raised the middle chapel of Windsor, and rebuilt the palace of Richmond.  The 
  Savoy was converted into a hospital, and in 1500 the Knights of St. John 
  elected the King as Protector.  
     In 1495 the law forbade the giving of liveries, signs, 
  tokens, etc., being an official enforcement of the Complaint made to the Star 
  Chamber in 1475.  Various minor works were in progress which we need not 
  particularise here; we may mention that John Hylmer and William Virtue 
  contracted, in 1507 for the groined roofing of St. George's Chapel at Windsor; 
  and in 1509 Robert Jenyns, Robert Virtue, and John Lobins, are styled "Ye 
  King's III Mr. Masons."  
     The palace of Sheen was rebuilt after the fire of 1500 
  in the Burgundian style.  Additions were made to Windsor, also to Hundsden, 
  Bridewell, and Newhall or Beaulieu in Essex.  
     Edward Stafford, Duke of Buckingham, began the palace of 
  Thornbury, in Gloucestershire, but went to the scaffold before completion.  
  The King in 1544 gave a Patent to John of Padua as "designer of his Majesty's 
  buildings," and a noted engineer, and Gothic architect, -- Sir Richard Lea, 
  was employed as a Master Mason, and had a grant of the Manor of Topwell in 
  Hertfordshire.  The Church of St. Mary at Beverley -- already mentioned {354} 
  -- was rebuilt, in the reign of Henry VIII.  It has upon the 6th Pillar: "This 
  pillar made the Minstrels."  The city usually had five officials of this 
  character; the Chief Minstrel had a long loose coat trimmed with fur, and the 
  costume of the others was a yellow jacket, long brown hose, blue belts, and a 
  heavy gold chain round the neck.  
     A new style in domestic architecture termed the Tudor 
  had arisen and is said to be Burgundian.  The Rev. Wm. Benham says that 
  Richard IlI. left an illegitimate son, 16 years of age at his father's death, 
  who got his living as a Mason, and was buried in Eastwell, Kent, thus 
  recorded: -- "Richard Plantagenet was buried the 22nd day of December ut 
  Supra" (1650), so that he must have been 81 years of age.  Drake (Eboracum p. 
  117) states that he was knighted by his father at York.  
     The reign of Henry VIII., 1509-47, was more remarkable 
  for other things than Masonry, Charles Dickens disposes of the King as a blot 
  of blood and grease on the page of English history.  Cardinal Wolsey and 
  Thomas Cromwell built several great works, -- Hampton Court, Whitehall, 
  Trinity College in Oxford, the College of Ipswich, St James' Palace, Christ's 
  Hospital in London, Esher in Surrey, and Greenwich Castle.  Lord Audley built 
  Magdalen College, and Audley-end.  In 1512 the "Master of Works" at Christ's 
  Church College in Oxford was Nicholas Townley, a priest.  In 1520 York Minster 
  was completed, and at the erection of St. Michael le Belfry, 1526, the Master 
  Mason was John Freeman with 13 Masons, 2 Apprentices, 1 Intailer, and 17 
  labourers.  In 1530 the London "Craft and Fellowship of Masons," adopted the 
  title of "Company of Freemasons."  There was in building at this date, and at 
  the period of the Reformation: -- St. James' Church, Bury; Lavenham, Suffolk, 
  Bidston Church tower, the Marks of which were collected in 1894<<Ars Quat. 
  Cor. 1894.>>, St. Stephen's, Norwich; Whiston, Northamptonshire, 1534; 
  Bath Abbey Church, 1539; Trinity College Chapel, Cambridge, 1539.  Of this 
  {355} century there is in Winchester Cathedral, a carved stone of the 
  Freemasons' Arms, and containing also the square, level, and compasses.<<Ibid, 
  i.>>  
     Brother H. R. Shaw points out in the Banner, some 
  interesting symbolism in the pavement of Printing-house Square, London, which 
  would be of value, had it been shewn to be ancient.  The manager of the 
  Times told him the site was that of old Blackfriars' Monastery, and, after 
  the Reformation, of the King's printing-house.  The square is slightly oblong 
  and divided with granite cubes, by diagonally crossed lines, so as to form 
  four triangles, each of which has a circle of cubes and in the centre an 
  emblem: in the east is a "cross," or it may be a pair of diagonals; in the 
  west is a five-pointed star.<<Freemason. 7 Sep., 1594.>>  An 
  interesting find was made in digging a drain, near Arreton, in the Isle of 
  Wight, in 1856, -- a basin of a species of bell-metal, which has on the 
  outside of the base the double triangles, a tau cross within three circles, 
  and at each of the six outer angles a star, and a seventh in the Centre, near 
  the Cross.<<Freem. Mag., 1856, p. 845.>>  
     The German Rivius, in his Steinmetzen Grund, 
  1548, terms the circle and triangle "the two most distinguished principles of 
  stone Masons," and he also adds that "the dimensions of the equilateral 
  triangle are the primitive and most distinguishing marks of ancient 
  cathedrals," of the period treated in this Chapter.  As practical symbols they 
  typified arithmetic and geometry, and were treated as the standpoints of all 
  created matter.  It is somewhat remarkable that an ancient emblem of the 
  theological trinity of Egypt, the triangle with an eye in it, passed into the 
  Christian Church, and is yet used as an emblem in the Oriental churches.  It 
  was carved in 1173 on the Sarcophagus of Bishop Eusebius who was interred at 
  Mount Athos, we have also seen it upon an old Armenian sword.  
     The regulations of the Masons and other Crafts for {356} 
  the City of Norwich are given in the 1903 volume of Ars Quatuor Coronatorum.  
  The Corporation possessed a "Book of Customs" from the 13th or 14th century.  
  The Bailiff and some 12 to 24 members of each Craft had the examination, with 
  power to levy fines, of the Craft guilds.  All apprentices were to be 
  indentured for seven years, and some of the 15th century are preserved.  The 
  Smith's Craft was at this period united with the Masons, and some regulations 
  were made in 1469 because of faults "used by the Masons to the dishonour of 
  their Craft," and it is stated in 1491 that no Masters or Wardens had been 
  sworn to make search for defective work.  An Apprentice roll from 1512 is 
  preserved and there are lists of Wardens until the middle of the 18th 
  century.  In the Mystery plays they had to perform the part of Abel and 
  Cain.  Each member paid an annual penny to the priest of the Chapel of St. 
  John who "sang for the prosperity of the brethren who are alive, and the souls 
  of those departed."  Some changes took place at the dissolution of Guilds in 
  1548 but the "feasts" and "fellowships," and the priest's salary, were 
  continued.  In 1572 rules for the Masons are drawn in the "Assembly Book," and 
  the Limeburners are included, with the fines each had to pay for various 
  faults.  The Masons were to assemble every year with their two Wardens and 
  headmen, and were to elect 12, 11, 10, 9, or 8 of the members, and these had 
  to elect new Wardens, headman, a beadall, annually, and fines are imposed for 
  not attending meetings, when summoned by the latter.  If necessary the fines 
  were recoverable by distress, half of which went to the town and half to the 
  Society.  These regulations do not differ very materially either from the 
  London Livery Companies, or the Scottish Incorporated Masters, nor from the 
  trade Incorporations granted by the Bishop of Durham.  There is no doubt such 
  bodies had usually a Speculative Lodge held of them, as at London and as at 
  Newcastle in 1581.  In other cases such assemblies granted an annual 
  commission, say of five, to Initiate.  {357}  
     Scotland.  We will now hark back a little to 
  examine the system which prevailed in Scotland; it embraces the features of 
  the English Livery Companies and the French Fraternities of Masters, with a 
  much stricter control over its members than the English Companies found it 
  convenient to enforce; and probably, at a later period, and even to this day 
  through the Grand Lodge, may have had an influence upon the English Society of 
  Free Masons, though the term Mason is always used in Scotland.  There is no 
  doubt that at an early period Scotland had its Masonic Assemblies,but early in 
  the 15th century, a cause was at work which modified the Assemblies, by 
  withdrawing the Masters into bodies, similarly to the English Companies.  A 
  Statute was passed in the reign of James I., 1424, empowering handicraftsmen 
  to elect a "Wise Man of the Craft" as "Dekyn or Kirk Master;" and it was found 
  necessary to bring Craftsmen from France, Flanders, Spain, Holland, and 
  England; the reason assigned being that all Scottish Men of Craft had been 
  slain in the wars.  The powers granted were obnoxious and abolished 2 years 
  later.  There followed upon this the constitution of Masters' Incorporations 
  granted by "Seal of Cause," upon a petition to the Lord provost and town 
  Council.  The Masons, Wrights, and Weavers received their Charter in 1475, 
  which would confirm their older self-made regulations; the Hammermen in 1475; 
  Butchers, 1488; Cordwainers, 1489.  The members of these Incorporations had to 
  contribute "a weekly penny," to support the altar and priest, equally a custom 
  of the French Masters' Fraternities.  Trial-pieces, "essays," or examinations, 
  equally with France, were exacted upon application for admission to the 
  Masters' Incorporations.  On opening and closing the meeting prayer was 
  offered up by the Deacon, as the Master was termed.  An oath was required 
  which embraced secrecy, obedience to their own and the Burgh laws, and to the 
  Deacon of their own trade, and also to a higher Officer that began to be 
  constituted in various towns, namely the {358} Deacon Convener, loyalty to the 
  King and the whole Craft.  
     The "Convenery" was established somewhat later than the 
  "Incorporations," the object being to unite the whole of the trades or Arts of 
  a town under one head and Assembly, composed of the Deacons or Masters of the 
  various "Incorporations;" these elected their own president or "Convener" thus 
  providing a supreme central authority.  
     We thus see the gradual transformation of the primitive 
  Assemblies into Lodges of Apprentices and Journeymen; Incorporations 
  of Masters; Conveneries of all trades; which were recruited by an 
  accepted trial-piece; the private Lodges being held in subjection to the 
  Masters-Fraternity initiated by "Seal of Cause."  These various bodies never 
  lost their legal status, and the Incorporations of the Masons and Wrights 
  exist to this day; but many of the private Lodges, which were subject, or 
  subordinate to them, went under the Grand Lodge of Scotland when it was 
  established in 1736.<<Vide Ars Quat. Cor. ii, p. 160; also v, p. 
  126.>>  It forms no part of our labours to give a history of Scottish Masonry, 
  but some information is necessary in regard to countries other than England.  
     The Burgh records of Aberdeen afford evidence from 
  1483-1555, that the Craft dealings with their employers, without reference to 
  esoteric Lodge work, resembled that of the 14th century Freemasons employed in 
  York Minster.  In 1483 the Masons at work are "obligated be the faith of thare 
  bodies," and there is mention of the Luge.  In 1484 it was ordered that the 
  Craftsmen "bear their tokens" on their breasts on Candlemas day; in 1496 that 
  every Craft have their standard.  In 1498 Matheu Wricht agreed "be his hand 
  ophaldin to make good service in the luge," also "that Nicol Masone and Dauid 
  Wricht oblist thame be the fathis of thar bodies, the gret aith sworne to 
  remain at Sand Nicholes werk in the luge. . . . . to be leil and truve in all 
  points."  In 1532 a "Seal {359} of Cause," established a Masters' 
  Incorporation; and in 1555 it was ordered that "thair be na craftsman made fre 
  man to use his craft except he haf seruit a Prentis under one maister three 
  yeiris, and he found sufficient and qualified in his Craft to be one Maister."  
  How are we to read this?  After serving an apprenticeship he had to be made 
  free of his Lodge, and could only become a Master and a Member of the 
  "Incorporation," after an "essay."  It is an instance of the loose language so 
  often found in Masonic documents, by which we are necessarily led away in 
  reasoning upon Masonic rites and laws.  A law of the Incorporation was in 
  force in 1587 that Journeymen and Prentices, though not members of the 
  Society, were to be entered in the books of their Craft, whilst apprentices 
  were to be entered in the books of the Town, to enable them to obtain the 
  rights of Freedom of Craft, as free Burgesses.  It seems like a side blow at 
  the Lodges, and the same custom was in force in the chief towns of England.  
  In 1599 a Convenery of all the trades was established, and their rules of 1641 
  enact that all Indentures between Masters and Prentices shall be presented to 
  the Town Clerk, within 21 days, for registry.  Of course all this legislation, 
  and the foundation of special bodies for the Masters, must have affected the 
  status and position of the Scottish Lodges materially, and the same in England 
  where Lodges were established in towns in which there was a Chartered Livery 
  Company.  
     Powers which had been granted 1424 were restored 1555.  
  A Dicreet Arbitral was issued by James VI. in 1580 by which the Council 
  consists of:  
  
    "The auld Provost, four auld Baillies, the Dean of Guild, 
    and Treasurer of the next year preceding, and three other Merchants to be 
    chosen to them, and also to consist of eight Craftsmen thereof, six Deacons, 
    and the other Craftsmen, mak, and in the hail, the said Council eighteen 
    persons." 
   
 
  Regulations follow as to the form of Apprenticeship.  In 
  1590 the same King, 25 Septr., appointed Patrick Copeland of Udaucht "Warden 
  and Justice" of {360} the Masons, but in 1601-2 the Freemen Maisons request 
  the St. Clairs to procure from the King the office of Patron and Judge, and 
  the document having perished by fire, the Lodges confirm it in 1628.  In 1598 
  and 1599 William Schaw, "Maister of Wark" to King James, granted Constitutions 
  to Edinburgh and Kilwinning districts, and perhaps also to Stirling and others 
  at these dates; these have already been mentioned.  
     There is a tomb in the Chapel Royal of Holyrood of the 
  year 1543 upon which is a stepped-cross; on one side of it is a compass and 
  some other emblem beneath, on the other side a square and below that a 
  square-headed gavel.  In Glasgow Cathedral, on the inside of a stone 
  window-sill of the south side of the choir and carved over the date 1556, is 
  an eye, crescent moon, three stars, hand pointing a finger, ladder of five 
  steps, square and compasses; these were pointed out by Brother W. P. Buchan 
  who casts doubt, we think unnecessarily, upon the date given.<<Freem. Mag., 
  1869 (engraved).>>  It may be noticed here, that the Lodge of Mary's Chapel, 
  Edinburgh, has minutes from 1599, and was old then, and that these minutes, 
  those of the Incorporation, and those of the Convenery are independent of each 
  other, and confirm what we have stated, and which we shall refer to more 
  fully.  In the year 1543 the Castle of Wark in Northumberland, was repaired by 
  an Italian of the name of Archan.  Soon after 1549 the Wark Lodge sent a 
  contingent Guild to Haddington, which afterwards went on to Aitchinson's 
  Haven, and St. John's Kilwinning Lodge, at Haddington, claims to be an 
  offshoot of the Wark Lodge.<<Some old Scot. Lodges, 1899, Liverpool, 
  Bro. Jobn Armstrong.>>  
     The Belgian Masons, Tilers, etc., had a Guild-house of 
  the "Four Crowned," erected at Antwerp in 1531, the walls of which were 
  decorated with the 4 Statues, and with seven large pictures representing their 
  martyrdom; the Guild is mentioned in 1423, and their Incorporation by the 
  Magistrates dates from 1458.  At Brussels at this {361} date the ranks alluded 
  to are Apprentices, Fellows, and Masters, but the Antwerp laws of 1458, allows 
  an Apprentice, at 18 years of age, who has served 4 years, to make his 
  trial-piece and become a Master.<<Ars Quat. Cor. 1900. pt. 2. Bro. 
  Count d' Alviella. P.G.M.>>  
     A recent history of Spanish Freemasonry, by Brother 
  Nicholas Diaz y Perez states that in 1514 Mosen Rubi established a Masonic 
  temple in Avila, and that the celebrated Admiral Coligny initiated a large 
  number of Spanish personages in Catalonia, and later in the army.  We give 
  this last with reserve.  In Danver's Portugese in India is an engraved 
  portrait, of which there is a copy in the British Museum, representing Prince 
  Henrique, surnamed the Navigator, in the upper left hand corner of which is 
  the level, square, plumb-line and weight, and open compasses: it was printed 
  about 1620 by Simon van de Paes.  
     In Sebastian Munster's Cosmography, printed in 
  1554, is the square and compasses in which is the letter G as a marginal 
  ornament.  "The Enemie of Idleness," by W. F. (Wm. Fleetwood), London, 1578, 
  mentions a work on architecture and the science of building by Baptista Leo, a 
  Florentine, and his "Secrete and hid discipline."  
     The compilation of this Chapter is much indebted to the 
  collections of the late E. W. Shaw, and Mr. Wyatt Papworth, also to the 
  Histories of Anderson and Gould, and the various papers of Ars Quatuor 
  Coronatorum.  The particulars, though interesting in themselves, relate 
  rather to the Craft in its operative and exoteric aspect; but they also shew 
  the nature of the speculative and esoteric Symbolism, the plan of the 
  Societies' organisation, the nature of an esoteric ritual, the fact that 
  Assemblies continued to be held; and that all things of the period of this 
  Chapter point to a perfect conformity with what is known of Guild Masonry, and 
  its imitation in the Free Masonry of to-day.  The Statute law and the 
  chartering of Livery Companies or Masters' Fraternities, seems to have 
  gradually shorn the Assemblies of much of {362} their prestige and privileges, 
  and contributed to make the more extensive Assemblies stationary town Lodges, 
  with a modified Constitution.  The abandonment of Gothic Art about 1550, and 
  the death of the operative Masters of that Art about 1580 accomplished the 
  rest and left Free Masonry what it was in 1700.  The Gothic arcanum had 
  died out; its Lodges had become mere social clubs; but a counter movement was 
  in progress under Inigo Jones to restore the arcanum of the Classical 
  architecture of Italy.  
     We cannot conclude better than with the following 
  quotation from Robert Fabian's Concordance of Histories, which appeared 
  in 1516 (Pynson).  The writer was Sheriff and Alderman of London, 1493-1502; 
  and died about 1511, but his book was not printed until 1516 by Pynson.  The 
  following is from his prologue of 28 Stanzas of which this is the 5th and 
  6th.  He may have been a member of the Mason's Company: --  
  
  
          "And I, 
  like the Prentice that heweth the rought stone,  
           And 
  bringeth it to square, with hard strokes and many,  
           That 
  the Master after, may it oeur gone  
           And 
  prynte therein his figures and his story,  
           And so 
  to work after his propornary  
           That 
  it may appear, to all that shall it see,  
           A 
  thynge right parfyte, and well in eche degree;  
           So 
  have I now sette oute this rude worke,  
           As 
  rough as the stone that comen to the square,  
           That 
  the learnede and the studyed Clerke,  
          May it 
  oeur polysshe, and clene do it pare,  
           
  Flowyrsshe it with eloquence, whereof it is bare,  
           And 
  frame it to ordre that yt is out of joynt,  
           That 
  it with old authors may gree in every poynt."  
  
     We will only add that we think that this Chapter clearly 
  proves that there was engrafted upon the simple Anglo-Saxon Constitution of 
  Masonry a series of Semitic legends, and their compliment in the Free-Masonic 
  ceremonies, which entered this country from the East in {363} Anglo-Norman 
  times, with an improved style of building, of Saracenic origin.  
     Whence England derived its Semitic ceremonies of Free 
  Masonry is not very definite but circumstances point very clearly to a direct 
  importation from Palestine, extended by French Masons who came over from time 
  to time and it is in that country that we find the earliest allusion to the 
  Solomonic legends, and it is evidenced in this Chapter that these legends were 
  introduced into the older Saxon Charges from that country.  
  {364}   
back to top  |