The Masonic Trowel

... to spread the cement of brotherly love and affection, that cement which unites us into one sacred band or society of brothers, among whom no contention should ever exist, but that noble emulation of who can best work or best agree ...

[What is Freemasonry] [Leadership Development] [Education] [Masonic Talks] [Masonic Magazines Online]
Articles] [Masonic Books Online] [E-Books] [Library Of All Articles] [Masonic Blogs] [Links]
What is New] [Feedback]

 Masonic quotes by Brothers

Search Website For

Add To Favorites

Help Me Maintain OUR Website!!!!!!

List of Contributors

PDF This File

Print This Page

Email This Site To ...


by John G. Hanna, M.P.S.; Montreal,
Published in MASONIC LIGHT, Huntingdon, PQ, October, 1951

In the summer number of Masonic Light [1951] you touch upon an interesting Masonic practice concerning certain questions put to the candidate before initiation.

In the fore part of the article, however, you assume that in all Masonic Lodges a number of questions relating to a belief in a Supreme Being and the survival of the soul after death are put to the person about to be initiated before admission to the Lodge room. This may be so in Lodges following what is known as the Canadian work, a form of the Emulation ritual. But in Lodges practicing the York or Scotch rites only one question is asked, and that is concerning his beleif in a Deity. That question is asked after the reception of the Candidate into the Lodge proper, and not in the anteroom.

Curiously enough, the problem presented in Masonic Light came before the Grand Lodge of British Columbia in 1911. I quote from the Grand Lodge proceedings in the matter:

"Elk River Lodge, before admitting candidates for initiation, has been in the habit of asking the following questions:

  1. "Do you believe in the existence of a Supreme Being?
  2. "Do you believe that the Supreme Being will punish vice and reward sin? [
  3. "Do you believe that that Supreme Being has revealed His will to man?

" Until the last regular meeting these questions have always been answered in the affirmative. At last meeting a candidate for initiation answered the first question in the affirmative, but refused to answer the second any further than saying "I do not know." As he would not answer the second question, the third was not put to him. His initiation was deferred until your ruling could be procured. Are we correct in asking these questions? If so, is it imperative that they be answered in the affirmative?

ANSWER - "The first of the Ancient Charges clearly defines the latitude in opinion permitted to Brethren of the Craft, and the 19th and 20th Landmarks, given in our Book of Ceremonies, (1st and 2nd Landmark, Quebec) contain all that may be considered common matter of belief by Freemasons. Beyond these tenets Brethren have the utmost liberty of thougth. I am, therefore of opinion that although some may think that question 2 and 3 are natural corollaries of question 1, the propounding of such questions is not only unnecessary but contrary to the usages of the Craft. The initiation of the candidate in question, therefore, should no longer be deferred for the sole reason that he would not give an affirmative answer to question 2"

The Committee on the Grand Master's Address reported as follows: "Your Committee agree with the Grand Master that the Old Charges allow a Masons the utmost latitude in the expression of his religious beliefs. With the strict interpretation of the law it is, perhaps, not absolutely necessary that these questions (2 and 3) be asked; but, nevertheless, we recommend that Lodges which have been following the practice be permitted to continue it."

"The report of the Committee was adopted. Proceedings, 1911."

It happens that the writer was a member of the above mentioned Lodge for some fifteen years, and, after serving in various offices, was Master in 1931, and during all those years only one question was asked of any candidate, and that concerned his belief in a Supreme Being. This took place in the Lodge room itself, and not in the preparation room. However, before penning these lines I took the precaution of writing to one of my old friends, R.W.Bro. Matthew Whitelaw, this year D.D.G.M. for District No. 8, G.R. B.C., and he advises that although the three questions above listed are shown as "permissable" in the 1950 Constitution of British Columbia, yet the Lodge still continues to ask only questiion No.1.

Elk River Lodge, No. 35, G.R.B.C. practices the York rite, and has no written or printed ritual, the work being communicated from mouth to ear in the good old-fashioned way. Questions 2 and 3 are not usual in the York rite Lodge. They probably were introduced by Canadian rite Masons who formed part of the original membership when the Lodge was instituted in 1900.

The Grand Lodge Committee, as you will notice, while upholding the Grand Master's ruling, yet added a rider to the effect that Lodges which have been following the practice of asking questons 2 and 3, be permitted to continue it. This of course, leaves the door wide open to future trouble.

In a spurious ritual known as THE WORK, but which to all intents and purposes is the same as the Quebec working, the three questions are given, and in exactly the same order, as in the British Columbia proceedings just referred to.

This theological disquisition reminds me of that great American clergyman and enthusiastic Mason of the 1820's, known as "Father" Taylor. This grand old man took great pride in his membership in the order, and was one of the Grand Chaplains of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts. Utterly free from all the rigid dogmatism of his day, he was never failing to expound the great Masonic doctrine that we as Masons, considering that man at his best is subject, to frailty and error, should always endeavour to cover up the faults and imperfections of our fellows with the broad mantle of charity and brotherly love.

To a minister who had taught the dogma of infant damnation, he said, "It's no use, brother, preaching sermons like that, because of what you say could be true, your God would be my devil".

back to top

[What is Freemasonry] [Leadership Development] [Education] [Masonic Talks] [Masonic Magazines Online]
Articles] [Masonic Books Online] [E-Books] [Library Of All Articles] [Masonic Blogs] [Links]
What is New] [Feedback]

This site is not an official site of any recognized Masonic body in the United States or elsewhere.
It is for informational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinion
of Freemasonry, nor webmaster nor those of any other regular Masonic body other than those stated.

DEAD LINKS & Reproduction | Legal Disclaimer | Regarding Copyrights

Last modified: March 22, 2014