The Masonic Trowel

... to spread the cement of brotherly love and affection, that cement which unites us into one sacred band or society of brothers, among whom no contention should ever exist, but that noble emulation of who can best work or best agree ...

[What is Freemasonry] [Leadership Development] [Education] [Masonic Talks] [Masonic Magazines Online]
Articles] [Masonic Books Online] [E-Books] [Library Of All Articles] [Masonic Blogs] [Links]
What is New] [Feedback]

 Masonic quotes by Brothers

Search Website For

Add To Favorites

Help Me Maintain OUR Website!!!!!!

List of Contributors

PDF This File

Print This Page

Email This Site To ...


by Bro. Robert G. Aberdeen, P.G.St

There is something going on in your mind right now!

If you are wondering "Just what does he mean by that?", then in a broad sense, you are philosophizing!

What is Philosophy?  We all recognize that it's a manner of thinking, but let's be more precise.  About 2500 years ago a Greek philosopher wrote "Men who love wisdom must inquire into a great many matters."  The word in his Greek text which was translated into English as "Men who love wisdom" was "Philosophoi".  It stems from two root words, both Greek: "philia", which means love or "philos" which means friend or lover, and "sophos", which means wise.

The term "philosophy" seems to be much abused and much misused we hear people talk of the marketing philosophy, the political philosophy, the philosophy of this, the philosophy of that.  Purists may argue that these uses are incorrect, and they may be right.  Personally, I don't really care, as long as the word refers to wisdom.  What I do object to is the use of the word to mean or to imply knowledge or information.  To have knowledge does not necessarily make us wise.

One dictionary defines philosophy as "love of wisdom"; or "the study of the causes or laws of phenomena"; or "the study of first principles".  To philosophize is "to search into the reason and nature of things"; or "to reason like a philosopher".  A philosopher is defined as "a lover of wisdom"; or one who studies philosophy, or lives according to its rules".  I think it should be "one who studies philosophy and lives according to its rules!"

What has all this to do with us?  As the title of this talk implies, I intend to investigate Masonic philosophy in a general way, without going into it in very great depth.  I will attempt merely to provide a layman's background for further thought, for Masons who may be wondering what Masonic philosophy means and what, if anything, they should do about it.

If you've already delved into philosophical inquiry, much of what I discuss will be old hat.  If you've read anything at all about the development of western thought, you might be expecting me to expound on - or at least quote from - the famous works of ancient philosophers with names that are, well . . . "Greek" to you.  I'm not going to do that because it's not of great importance to us in the context of this discussion.  My specific concern is with the value I can derive as a man and a Mason by developing from the tenets and principles of Freemasonry a personal code by which to guide the course of my everyday life.  To do this, I must philosophize!

What is the philosophy of Masonry?  The Masonic Bible contains this description:

. . . the philosophical basis of masonry involves the history of its origin, an inquiry into the ideas that lie at its base, an investigation of its peculiar form, an analytical study of its several degrees, and a development of the ideas which are illustrated by its ritualistic emblems, myths and veiled allegories and which speak through its sublime system of symbols.

Some time ago I was having supper with a business associate from out of town and since I had been giving the matter quite a bit of thought, I brought up the general subject of philosophy.  He commented that philosophy is only of academic interest and that it has nothing to do with the business of earning a living.   "It's ancient history," he said, "and only useful as mental exercise."  I'm sure he was just putting me on, because to me, philosophy is as modern as the space shuttle and as relevant to daily living as knowing how to drive a car.   It touches each of us.  Indeed, it directs our entire lives; moreover, it's something we can make conscious use of, with very little effort.

What use is philosophy?  It aids us to understand the nature and development of our civilization and to realize just where we stand.  It both interprets our world and changes it, by changing us.  Philosophy is largely a matter of meanings and the analysis of meanings.  It insists, therefore, that we learn to view all alternatives.  At the very least, it improves our use of language.   I'll comment further on that a bit later.  First, however, I ask that you consider this explanation of Freemasonry in the second paper in Alberta's Lodge Plan for Masonic Education:

. . . certain principles or fundamental truths which have been proven Freemasonry has gathered together or taken those by time to be necessary for right thinking and moral living . . . (and) presents these fundamentals to its initiates for their use in formulating their own personal philosophy of life or establishing their own personal code of moral living.

A turn-of-the-century philosopher named William James once remarked that all men have a philosophy, in the sense that every person has general views on the universe and strong commitments to certain inclusive values.  These views and values are generally the product of blind custom and a narrowly limited experience.  Most people are hardly aware that they do have a philosophy or that their conceptions of the world are built on assumptions and traditional beliefs which may not be valid.

When a man questions, examines and assesses the validity of the cardinal assumptions underlying his traditional beliefs, he may be said to be a philosopher, not merely to have a philosophy.  The principles and truths of Freemasonry are presented symbolically in the degrees. Bro. H. L. Haywood, a distinguished Masonic writer, tells us emphatically that

One of the greatest purposes of Freemasonry is to set a man to the task of understanding these symbols for himself.

You see, Brethren, the symbols can be interpreted for you by others, but no one can understand them for you - you have to understand them for yourself.  It's been said that the purpose of Freemasonry is to help the individual man to improve himself.  To make this improvement he must philosophize, that is, he must question, examine and assess the application of the principles which Masonry presents.

In spite of all the foregoing we have yet to answer the question, "what is philosophy?"  Take heart, even philosophers of renown disagree.   They disagree on the ultimate objectives, the proper methods and the legitimate scope of philosophical inquiry, but whatever else you wish to include in the aims of the philosophical enterprise, most philosophers do agree that it does have the task of explaining the meaning of the major concepts we use in understanding our experiences and clarifying the conditions of responsible moral judgment.  Responsible moral judgment, is that what we're after?

Philosophers have tried many definitions of philosophy: "the study of the universe and man's place in it"; "the quest for knowledge of the first or ultimate principles of things"; "a stubborn attempt to think clearly" and "a questioning of answers rather than an answering of questions".  I like that last one, "a questioning of answers".  Early in our careers as Masons we are admonished to ". . . make a daily advancement in Masonic knowledge."   As man advances in knowledge, he invariably discovers new tools for analyzing his accepted world.  Often he may begin to doubt the adequacy of previously proposed answers.  "The more we learn, the less we know," as they say.   Philosophy, then, has come to mean the search for truth, not the possession of it.

There are, of course, several branches of philosophy.  The ancient philosophers were particularly concerned with the study of the physical world, which we call Natural Philosophy.  This branch led to our modern science with its facts and proven theorems.  Here we can see clearly that advances in knowledge replaced old answers with newer, more adequate ones.  In the field of Logic we can see progress in the refinement of the methods of reasoning.  The study of how one attains knowledge is called Epistemology and the appreciation of beauty is called Aesthetics.  The study of the first principles of being, the ultimate reality, is called Metaphysics, meaning beyond natural science, and deals with concepts of divinity and life after death (as taught by Freemasonry).  Moral Philosophy deals with the principles of human action and conduct.

The two last-mentioned branches, Metaphysical and Moral Philosophy, seem to encompass what we call Masonic Philosophy.  We are concerned with beauty, but in the Metaphysical sense, as a representation of the design of Deity.

In the twelfth paper of our Lodge Plan for Masonic Education the teachings of Masonry are discussed.  We are reminded that Masonry is dedicated to the Great Architect of the Universe and that

. . . this philosophy of masonry, like all else in its teaching, is not set forth in written creeds or in any other form of words; the the Mason must come upon it for himself and put it in such form as will satisfy his own mind.

Now, that statement may seem hard to believe, at first.  We can understand that each of us must "put it in such form as will satisfy his own mind," but with our vast libraries filled with thousands of Masonic books and papers, how can we say that Masonic philosophy and teachings are "not set forth . . . in . . . words"?

Let's consider words, for a moment. Words and language are the tools of philosophers.  Wittgenstein (1889-1951), an influential philosopher, put forward what some people considered to be a radical thesis.  He said, "The problems of philosophers arise in consequence of fundamental errors in the use of language."   Language is the instrument we use in the formation and communication of ideas and is therefore of central importance to philosophy.  The difficulty is that when you transmit a thought, you use words which are clear to you but which may not hold exactly the same meaning for your listener.  He tends to understand your words in his own terms of reference, not yours, and distortion creeps in.  You may recall the party game in which one person whispers a prepared story to another; he in turn passes it on to the person next to him and so on until it comes back to the originator, who writes it down for comparison.  The result usually differs a great deal from the original, often to the point of hilarity, to the delight of all as both versions are read aloud.

This distortion is compounded by our natural tendency to add coloration by using words metaphorically, emotionally and pictorially.  You might describe a dear friend of yours as being firm in his convictions, but to someone else, he's nothing short of pig-headed.  Both descriptions mean that your friend is not easily influenced.   Another difficulty that leads to confusion is that the accepted meanings of some words change with the passing years.

Language is ever fluctuating: it is, after all, a product of culture and therefore subject to cultural change.  The words we use in communicating thoughts, ideas, feelings, are imperfect tools and are often vague or uncertain in definition.   Every philosopher since the days of Socrates and Plato has struggled with the problem of the precise meaning and definition of words, which we call Semantics.

Dictionaries frequently give several meanings of a word and these meanings are usually obvious from the context in which the word is used, but many words are indefinite and ambiguous.  What is "religion", an organization or a spiritual impulse?  What is "love", and how do you "make" it?   How do you assign a precise meaning to "mind", "reality", "justice", "happiness", "truth", "God"?

Unfortunately, the key terms in philosophy are such as these.  We can and do argue indefinitely over misunderstood statements because of our errors in the use of language.  But, when one undertakes a study of philosophy or engages in a philosophical discussion, he must take care to stay within one meaning of a term, without limiting that term to that single meaning forever.

The authors of the rituals which we use probably chose their words and phrases with great care in order to convey their meanings with utmost clarity.   Certainly the rituals have changed over the years but still many Masons of today have difficulty in comprehending what our forefathers found so obvious.  When we begin to learn the work, many passages seem difficult and lacking in continuity.  But as the original meanings sink in, they become clear and fluid.  The principles of Freemasonry are there, in words and symbols.  It only remains for us to study them, to view them from all angles, to categorize them and put then, in usable form: to come to understand them for ourselves.

Let's review our progress in this review of Masonic Philosophy.   We've defined philosophy as a search for ultimate truth in the sense of wisdom, not merely knowledge or information.  Truth is one of the fundamental principles of Freemasonry, but we never clearly explain what we mean by truth.  We'll talk about that a bit later, but you can see the reason why we say, in the Lodge Plan for Masonic Education, that Masonry's teaching method

. . . makes a Mason study and learn for himself, forces him to search out the truth, compels him to take the initiative, as a grown man should, so that the very act of learning is in itself of great educational value.

When the candidate comes to our door he already holds general views on the universe which guide his actions, but those views may be based on assumptions and beliefs of dubious validity.  By a careful study of Masonic principles his views and values may be improved and, we hope, he will because of this become a better person.  To discover the real meaning of Masonry, the secret of the Masonic art, the dedicated Mason must philosophize on its teachings.  We've said that those teachings seem to be primarily concerned with the guiding influence of a Supreme Being and the immortality of the soul, and with the necessity of morality.  Let's examine those concerns more closely.

Freemasonry is devoted to Brotherhood in the sense that all men are brothers under the Fatherhood of one Supreme Being.  Our Brotherhood, then, has a spiritual basis, a commonality regardless of religion or creed.  To ensure that commonality, we require that our initiates believe in the existence of one God and the immortality of the soul, and that God's will has been revealed to man.  Is it important whether we believe that the Holy Book of our Faith was authored by God or that it was authored by men who were inspired by God?  I'll leave that to you, but the book on our altar is at the centre of our Lodge and at the centre of Masonry.   Masonry begins and ends every undertaking with prayer. Our candidates are received into the Lodge in the name of God and immediately after the reception we invoke the blessing of Deity.  We ask, among other things, that the candidate ".

. . may be the better enabled to display the beauties of true godliness What do we mean by "true godliness" and what is meant by the "beauty" of it?

After the first invocation, the candidate is asked in whom he places his trust.  To avoid the embarrassment of an incorrect response his guide usually whispers the required answer in his ear.  There has been some argument that to do so is improper.  Perhaps his guide should whisper "If you place your trust in God, say 'in God'," thus leaving the candidate to make the decision.  He might otherwise answer "I trust in my own ability to wiggle out of tight spots, but if all else fails, I would put my trust in God."  Should we accept a qualified answer?   I'll leave that to you, as well, and although the answer may seem evident, remember that we must learn to view all alternatives.

In the Charge to the Newly Initiated Candidate we recommend that he contemplate the Volume of the Sacred Law, charging him to regulate his actions by the divine precepts therein and to learn from them his duties to God, to society and to self.   There are other charges in our Constitution which we are directed to read at the making of new brethren or when the Master shall order it, yet very seldom are they read.   These are commonly called the Ancient Charges, the first of which is Concerning God and Religion.  They all deserve the contemplation of Masonic philosophers (as I hope you consider yourself to be) but since we're discussing spiritual matters, let me quote from the first:

Man looketh at the outward appearance, but God looketh to the heart. A Mason is, therefore, particularly bound never to act against the dictates of his conscience. Let a man's religion, or mode of worship be what it may, he is not excluded from the order, provided he believe in the Architect of heaven and earth, and practice the sacred duties of morality.

Here we find the spiritual and the moral closely interlinked.  We seem to be instructed to try to understand and respect the creeds of others without bias or prejudice.  The Charge continues:

Masons unite with the virtuous of every persuasion, in the firm and pleasing bond of fraternal love; they are taught to view the errors of mankind with compassion, and to strive, by the purity of their own conduct to demonstrate the superior excellence of the faith they may profess.

Doesn't that seem to contradict the previous instruction?  It depends on the meaning you apply to the word "faith".  Faith can mean "the truth which one believes", that is, one's own personal religion, or it can be given the broader meaning of "trust in the Great Architect of the Universe".  Do you see the importance of precise meanings and definitions of words?  Let's consider another aspect of the last quotation - "Masons unite with the virtuous of every persuasion. . ."  Here we have a qualifier in the word "virtuous".   The corollary is that Masons do not unite with men who believe in God, unless they are also virtuous.  May we not then ponder the purpose of providing lessons of virtue only to the virtuous?  "The lessons of virtue . . ." as we say in the General Charge, ". . . are carefully imbibed by the workmen."  According to one dictionary, a virtuous man is already "pure in thought and deed" and is "living a good, upright life."  Pure means "free from moral or physical defilement."  Is not a thing either pure or impure? The Charge concludes:

Thus Masonry is the centre of union between good men and true, and the happy means of conciliating friendship amongst those who must otherwise have remained at a perpetual distance.

Well - that charge by itself is certainly something on which to philosophize. There are, of course, many other considerations of this aspect of Masonic philosophy.  Indeed, the Master Mason Degree itself is almost wholly devoted to the spiritual.  Or is it?  The paper in the Lodge Plan for Masonic Education which deals with the interpretation of the ritual of this degree states that "it is, indeed, a 'sublime' degree, which a man may study for years without exhausting."   Sublime means "having noble qualities" or "giving rise to high or noble thoughts".  The paper goes on to say:

In the first two degrees you were surrounded by the symbols and emblems of architecture; in this degree you found a different order of symbolism, cast in the language of the soul - its life, its tragedy and its triumph. To recognize this is the first step in interpretation of this sublime and historic step in "Craft Lodge" Masonry. The second point is to recognize that the Master Mason Degree has many meanings; it is not intended to be a lesson complete, finished, closed.

There are many interpretations of the Degree, all true.  But most essentially, it is a drama of the immortality of the soul, setting forth the truth that, while a man withers away and perishes, there is that in him which perishes not.

Let's change the emphasis now and consider morality.  Freemasonry has been defined as a "system of morality," and is described in the Canadian Rite as "....the most moral human institution that ever existed ...."  The definitions of "moral" include: "Pertaining to a person's conduct"; "concerned with the rightness or wrongness of thoughts and actions"; "acting according to the law of right and wrong".  I've always thought that the term "moral" was interchangeable with the term "ethical" in the same way that we interchange Masonry and Freemasonry.  Ethic is derived from the Greek word "ethicos" which means "moral" and moral comes from the Latin "mores", meaning "custom" or "conduct".  The word "moral" is also used as a noun and in this sense means the lesson of a story or fable.  Perhaps this meaning is more applicable to Masonry than we realize.  I found one dictionary definition of "ethics" which seems to draw a fine distinction - it calls ethics "the rules which regulate duty or conduct."   That distinction, I believe, is of some importance when considering the teachings of Masonry.  Masonry not only demonstrates the important truths of morality, it also instructs us in how to apply these truths to our daily lives and conduct.  Morality, we are told, "is a name for the forces that bind us in the relations of amity and accord ...."  Confucius, the Chinese philosopher, said: "I have taught men how to live."

At the conclusion of the Master Mason Degree, the newly raised candidate is charged, in part, "to improve the morals and correct the manners of men in society ...."  The phrase "to improve the morals" implies to me that morals are subject to change.  If they can be improved, may they not also worsen?  We speak of the current wave of sexual freedom as a "new morality" or as a loosening of moral standards.  The point I'm making is that if morals can be changed and improved, improved in relation to what?  What is the standard?  Are we referring to that perfection toward which we must ever strive, the "beauty of true godliness," or have we a more earthly standard?  Who sets these standards?   Are they not contained in the divine precepts of the Volume of the Sacred Law?   The new Mason is told in the Charge to regulate his actions by these precepts, and ethics is defined as the rules which regulate duty or conduct.  Further, he is charged to consider the Volume of the Sacred Law as the unerring standard of truth and justice.  The Holy Bible itself, however, reveals evidence of ethical advancement.   The Mosaic Law of Retaliation (life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot) is contained in Exodus, Chapter 21, verses 23 and 24.  The previous chapter of the same book reveals the Ten Commandments and the 19th chapter of Leviticus, the following book, contains the statement of the Golden Rule: ". . . love thy neighbor as thyself."

Adding to the confusion of changing customs and morals is the problem of differing standards among the various cultures.  How do we know that our morality is the only right one?  Many differences in moral standards between cultures are due to geographic locations.  Differing climates dictate differing modes of dress and this may lead to traditional beliefs with no basis in fact.  To a person who has gone naked all his life because of the hot, humid nature of his environment, whose entire background accepts nudity as an everyday fact, may not the wearing of clothes, a covering and concealing of the body, seem immoral?  Can we legitimately question the moral validity of the differing practices of other cultures?  How do we know that right is right, that good is good, that we ought to love our neighbor and strive for excellence?

We know that all peoples have certain rules of behavior and that these rules may vary from man to man, from country to country and from civilization to civilization.  Everyone receives some kind of moral education, beginning in his formative years and continuing through adulthood. Somewhere along the line this education stops or "sets in".  Values are established.  Freemasonry continues this moral education, changing and improving the morals of men in society, with reference to the highest standards accepted by that society.  These are the norms which we regard as true.

As stated in an earlier explanation, Masonry presents to its initiates those fundamental truths which have been proven by time to be necessary for right thinking and moral living.  Thought, as well as action.  We accept, then, that at least some moral values are permanent, but when we talk about maintaining the good order of society, we must also accept that under certain conditions, even these "permanent" values may change. Thus we may find moral problems in our definition of ". . . murder, treason, felony and all other offences contrary to the laws of God or man."  Is abortion or execution murder?  Is draft-dodging treason?   Is the Mosaic Law of Retaliation a law of God?  Must we always obey the man-made laws of our society which have long been obsolete but which still exist simply because we haven't gotten around to passing the necessary legislation to remove them?   Would you act as Socrates did when he drank the hemlock when the doors of his prison were open rather than set the example of disobeying the laws of his country?   These are the type of questions that each must ponder for himself in his search for truth.

Earlier, I suggested that philosophy has come to mean the search for truth, but "truth" is never clearly defined.  What do we mean by truth?   Truth is agreement with fact; yes, but as a tenet of Freemasonry, truth must be exact.

Actually, truth refers not to the fact itself, but to what we believe or state about the fact.  I hold in my hand a long, narrow instrument.  It is something that I use to write with, but it is neither true nor false: it is a fact.   If I state "this is a pen" and it is a pen, then my statement is true.   If it happens to be a pencil, my statement is untrue.  If I believe it to be a pen when in fact it is not, even if I have always called that specific type of instrument a pen, my statement is still untrue.  Just because it is true as far as I'm concerned doesn't make it true.  Truth consists in stating the actual fact.  This may seem pretty obvious to you but when we search for ultimate truth, in the philosophical sense, we must distinguish between reality, and dogma and opinion.  We tend to call our firm beliefs "truths" without knowing if they are, in fact, the case.  We may believe with absolute conviction that a thing is true, but what we believe may be wrong.   How do we prove that our belief is true?  To determine whether a thing is true or false we must apply certain tests.  Our methods of testing are central to the philosophical enterprise.

We know that about some things we may be quite sure, while others may require exhaustive study just to arrive at the point of arguable probability. Physical objects can be identified with a high degree of certainty, things that we can see, touch, smell, hear and taste.  Adding to these impressions our previous experience, we may be able safely to conclude that the thing we're concerned with is true.  The senses, however, may be confused and experience may be hallucination.  In a darkened room a shadowy form may appear to be something which it is not.  Before we make a statement about such a form we apply tests - we may touch it, walk around it, even turn on the light or strike a match.  Perhaps it's because we rely so much on the sense of sight to provide the basic evidence for truth that we often say we are seeking for light.  To illumine the mind is to perceive truth.  We find it said, "light comes from God."  Can we now read new meaning into the phrase, "God said, let there be light: and there was light."  Light was the predominant symbol in all of the ancient mysteries, revered because it was an emanation from the sun, the common object of worship.  Pythagoras called it the good principle of nature, and the Cabalists taught that eternal light filled all space before the creation, and that after creation it retired to a central spot and became the instrument of the Divine Mind in creating matter.   Light, therefore, became synonymous with truth and knowledge, and darkness with falsehood and ignorance.  It is therefore a fundamental symbol of Freemasonry, and contains within itself the very essence of the speculative science.

To quote once more from the Lodge Plan for Masonic Education, on page 58:

The purpose of secrecy is not to keep the candidate in the dark, but to stimulate him to seek the light . . .

Again, on page 60:

Men . . . cannot work together except they all understand the work to be done, hence the need for enlightenment.

And once more, on page 63:

. . . learning the trial lecture of the three degrees . . . will be a possession for you within your own mind, from which you will constantly draw inspiration and light in your daily life.

You've noticed that throughout this talk I've quoted several times from the Lodge Plan for Masonic Education, published by the Grand Lodge of Alberta.  I've done this purposely because I wanted to use a commonly-available and easy to read reference to Masonic philosophy outside of our rituals. Those of you who have read the booklet thoroughly and have contemplated its contents will agree that it outlines most of the Masonic philosophy covered in this overview.

There is one other statement of Masonic philosophy with which we're all familiar - the General Charge which is given once a year in each Lodge, at the conclusion of the Ceremony for Investing the Officers of a Lodge.  I believe that it should be printed in our Book of Constitution along with the other charges and that all charges, particularly the General Charge, should be pointed out as the first objects of study for each Master Mason as soon as possible after he completes the degrees.

I'd like to touch on one or two points brought out in the General Charge. We are told in the first paragraph and again, just before the moving portrayal of the ideal of a Freemason, that we should have but one aim, the attainment of the chief point in Freemasonry, which is to endeavor to be happy ourselves and to communicate that happiness to others.  This, then, should always be uppermost in our minds.  But - what is happiness?  Pleasure and mirth?  The absence of painful experience?   Peace of mind?  A sense of satisfaction and fulfillment?  How is it to be achieved?  We are told that the chief employments in the tyled recesses of the Lodge are constituted in a calm enquiry into the beauty of wisdom and virtue, and the study of moral geometry.  Perhaps we should refer this as well to the tyled recesses of our minds, whether within the Lodge or without.

I am constantly amazed at the ritualist who delivers the Work letter-perfect, with dignity and with meaning that seems to come from the heart, and then spoils it all by telling the kind of story at the Festive Board that has no place at a Masonic gathering.  To him, the Ritual appears to be the be-all and the end-all of the Craft.  There are others who seem to feel that Freemasonry consists in taking in new members at the one end and cranking out past masters at the other.  Of course, not all Masons who have yet to delve into Masonic philosophy are "one-or-two-night-a-month" Masons by any means.  Many of the men who come knocking at our door do so because they have always tended, as we say in the General Charge, to move quietly and modestly in the spheres of their lives, generally conducting themselves as Masons should, and they're looking for companions with similar standards.   Perhaps I should be satisfied with that.  Perhaps I would be, if all the men we admit were of such a nature.  After all, not everyone is interested in studying.   Their improvement will surely come about through their association with Freemasonry and their participation in its activities, though it will take much more time and assuming that we can maintain their interest long enough.

Perhaps I seem impatient.  If so, it's because I'm anxious to share that which I've found in Freemasonry with those who are still wondering if what they see on the surface is all there really is to the Craft.

Let me conclude by sharing with you a bit of prose about fireplaces that appeared some time ago in the Ottawa Journal and was reprinted in the Reader's Digest.   As I read it, it reminded me of the philosopher's approach to Freemasonry.  It is, in a way, allegorical, and makes us think about Masonic philosophy:

There are utilitarian souls who assume that a fireplace is meant only to warm people. But he who tends a fire knows that it means much more.

A man who has a fireplace need never be lonely. A fire, correctly tended, requires thought and attention; in return, it offers warmth, music and beauty. And the glow from the hearth means a glow in the heart.

A man who cherishes his fire wants a solid backlog of oak or hard maple. If he is fortunate enough to cut his own wood and has a choice, he sees to it that he has several kinds. The resin of pine or cedar means quick, hot heat, yellow flames and a pleasant odor; yellow birch gives an orange-blue flame, burns long and steady; old apple wood means fragrance and a clear, bluish flame. Elm has deep russet flames. Balsam and spruce crackle and spit and must be watched.

Don't poke your fire too much, but use judgement as you put on the logs. A moderately high fire creates its own draft. A good hearth tender uses his broom occasionally, but doesn't worry if a few ashes spill out.

Tending fire is for the patient man. It fosters deep thoughts and a contentment with the simple basic things in life . . Mechanical heat has its good points and one wants it. But somehow it is more meaningful if flames paint a picture in a fireplace and a man has a chance to tend his fire.

Why not make your fire - Freemasonry?


Aberdeen, Robert G., "What Am I Doing Here?", Edmonton: Edmonton Masonic Research Group, 1974.

Alberta, The Grand Lodge of, Ceremony for Investing the Officers of a Lodge, Calgary, 1973.

----,Constitution of the Grand Lodge of Alberta, A. F. & A. M., Calgary, 1969

----,Lodge Plan for Masonic Education, Calgary, 1970

----,The Work (Canadian Rite), Calgary, 1970.

Duncan, A. R. C., Moral Philosophy, Toronto: CBC Publications, 1965

Grunebaum, L. H., Philosophy for Modern Man, New York: Horizon Press, 1970.

Highroads Dictionary, Revised Canadian Edition, Toronto: Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd., 1959.

Holy Bible, The, Temple Illustrated Edition, Philadelphia: A. J. Holman Company, 1957.

Hook, Sidney, Contemporary Philosophy, New York: American Library Association, 1968.

Juthner, Robert E., "Masonic Philosophy: Its Heritage, and Relevance to Daily Living", Baner: The Nineteenth Masonic Spring Workshop, 1974.

Mackey, A. C. and R. T. Clegg (rev.), Mackey's Symbolism of Freemasonry, Chicago: The Masonic History Company, 1960.

Reader's Digest, Canadian Edition, Westmount, PQ; Reader's Digest Magazines Limited, January 1974.

Thouless, Robert H., Straight and Crooked Thinking, London: Pan Books Ltd., 1973.

Ward, J. S. M., The E.A's Hancbook, Fourth Edition, London: The Baskerville Press, Ltd., 1974.

back to top

[What is Freemasonry] [Leadership Development] [Education] [Masonic Talks] [Masonic Magazines Online]
Articles] [Masonic Books Online] [E-Books] [Library Of All Articles] [Masonic Blogs] [Links]
What is New] [Feedback]

This site is not an official site of any recognized Masonic body in the United States or elsewhere.
It is for informational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinion
of Freemasonry, nor webmaster nor those of any other regular Masonic body other than those stated.

DEAD LINKS & Reproduction | Legal Disclaimer | Regarding Copyrights

Last modified: March 22, 2014